User talk:Pen of bushido

This user may have left Wikipedia. Pen of bushido has not edited Wikipedia since 26 September 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi Pen of bushido, welcome to Wikipedia. Since you have an account, you can create articles for yourself, you don't need to request at articles for creation. You might want to take a look at WP:BIO first though.

P.S. standard welcome goes like this:

Welcome!

Hello, Pen of bushido, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Kappa 09:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paratyphoid fever

Hi. The redirect you just created was a double redirect e.g. Paratyphoid fever > Paratyphoid > Salmonella. These don't work properly and the user ends up at Paratyphoid. I changed the Paratyphoid fever so it goes direct to Salmonella. This happens all the time and usually gets fixed. It's not a problem but I just thought I would let you know for next time. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Philip Quast 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Philip Quast 2005.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Philip Quast 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Philip Quast 2005.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 21:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G18

Not sure what you ment but I found these. I put the G18 back too. If it was something else let me know. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wife swapping in India

I will take a look at it. :) --Moonriddengirl 18:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. It's gone. There are a couple of speedy criteria I could have pursued--it wasn't a notable club, for instance, so it qualified for WP:CSD#A7, but I went with advertising, WP:CSD#11. If it comes back or if you run into other articles, you can mark an article for speedy deletion for any administrator's notice. The templates used for doing that are found here: Wikipedia:Speedy_deletion#Deletion_templates. You just choose the correct one and put it at the top of the article, and it will usually be evaluated within an hour. Sometimes, within minutes, but once in a while there's a backlog. :) Thanks for bringing it to my attention. --Moonriddengirl 18:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, offline publication, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 02:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What links here

I think the user to whom you were responding on my talk page probably noticed the deletion log that listed "Wife swapping" as having been deleted for "advertisement" and was amused by that. :)

You can find what links to a page by looking at the "toolbox" under the search window. The first tool is "what links here". Hope that helps. :) --Moonriddengirl 15:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bombardment of Yarmouth and Lowestoft

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bombardment of Yarmouth and Lowestoft, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bobhenneman.info/yar1916.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 18:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Request: Rank graphics, etc. in military biographies

Please discuss the inclusion of rank graphics in military biographies. I believe there was a recent discussion in the Military history WikiProject on the addition of graphics to the infoboxes. I believe that general rank graphics don't add; specific graphics that uniquely define a person, such as Medal of Honor or SMMC are exceptions. A general discussion on the WikiProject is a good idea. — ERcheck (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

27th Guards Rifle Division (Soviet Union)

Hi Pen, thanks for your edit at Divisions of the Soviet Union. It's great when people take time to help out on such an esoteric (for English-speakers) topic. However one really has to be careful. There were two completely separate divisions, 27th Rifle Division, and, in the Guards Rifle Division series, which went up to 90 or 100, a separate formation, 27th Guards Rifle Division. Divisions were promoted to Guards status for exceptional valuable combat service. What you did was to link the 27th Rifle Division to the Guards formation, inaccurately, as well as fixing the link for the 27th Guards Rifle Division proper. Buckshot06 13:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for the quick reply. Buckshot06 13:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Awards of the United States Marine Corps

Your redirect was to a non-existent page. I changed it to go to what I think is the correct page, which is a wikilink from Awards and decorations of the United States military#Active United States medals and ribbons. If I was mistaken, please feel free to correct it. Truthanado 14:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects that aren't broken

Hello! I've noticed that you're changing links to redirects that aren't broken. That is against Wikipedia editing guidelines, because it's much harder on Wikipedia's servers to make an edit like this than it is for people to just occasionally follow the redirects. Please do not change links to redirects that aren't broken unless you're making other, useful changes to the article at the same time. TomTheHand 15:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

Thanks for your note. :) I have replied. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image:L-13 Grasshopper.jpg

Your file is about to be deleted because it's only licensed for use on Wikipedia. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, since explicit permission to use it was given, this is in fact not the case - Wikipedia content must be completely free for other people (newspapers, companies, advertising groups) to re-use, too! I've held off deleting it for now, so you can get permission if you want to. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 19:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at this section for info on it. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kyriakos (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 19th Infantry Division Gavninana (Italy)

Hi, I noticed you changed the name of this article. It had conformed to the practice observed at List of Italian divisions in WWII, which I had assumed was using the established naming style for military units. I have no strong opinion about what form should be used in Wikipedia, but if you are standardizing these names you probably should look there & at the articles linked to the red links there -- & make sure your understanding matches what other Wikipedians (for example Asiaticus) believe it to be. -- llywrch (talk) 20:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 21:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can talk on this page

When you tag an article such as You can talk on this page for speedy deletion, please make sure to leave a warning on the article creator's talk page. It's important that the article creator be notified that you can't talk on that page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! :)

Anyone who helps whack the vandals such as you've been doing deserves a pat on the back. However, the best way to alert someone to the error of his ways is to leave word on the talk page, not the user page. Again, thanks for the help! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are WAY overdue for this:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, PMDrive1061, do hereby bequeath and bestow the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar on you for the tireless and thankless work you do helping alert vandals to knock off the nonsense. RickK was my good friend on this site years ago under my old username and it's an honor to give this to you tonight. PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vontae Davis

I am re-creating the article, he is a top prospect for next years drafts, you could have givin me a chance to improve it before deleting, that was complte BS--Yankees10 16:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military unit naming conventions

Please be aware, that, per WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME, "The disambiguator is not necessary in cases where the name of the country is already present in the name of the unit... or where the name is clearly unique". In particular, the consensus is that the inclusion of "SS" in the unit name sufficiently identifies the unit as being German. Thanks! Kirill 13:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in commenting at WT:MILHIST#Unit naming convention and unambiguous names as well. Thanks! Kirill 14:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same is also true of UK divisions that include unique disambiguators like "(2nd West Lancashire)" in the name of the unit - an additional parenthetical is a little unnecessary - the current locations of these units also reflects consensus, I think. Carom (talk) 14:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help

Sure, fell free to contact me for assistence at anytime. (Sheliak (talk) 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: 14th (Light) Division

Another user has just started a discussion on this topic here; you may be interested in participating. Thanks for not starting an edit war over this - I think that a civil discussion can probably produce some agreement. Carom (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SAAF Squadron naming conventions

Hi there,

I've come across a few of your edits of South African Air Force squadron articles, in which you changed the format into the Commonwealth naming format. I'm afraid while this would seem like a logical change to make, it's incorrect. Unlike nearly all the other Commonwealth air forces, the South African Air Force does not use the 'No. x Squadron' format. The reason for the change appears to be related to the decision by the newly-elected Nationalist Party, in the early 1950s, to wean the South African military off its strong war-era ties to the British military. As part of this, the entire rank structure was overhauled, with the Commonwealth-style ranks (such as Wing Commander) being replaced with their American equivalents or with Army-style ranks, the uniform was changed and the squadron naming format was gradually altered. The end result was a curious amalgam of the Commonwealth and American naming formats, with the former services' preceding 'No.' being dropped in favour of the latter service's leading number style, but without the attending addition of the usual suffix (as in '42nd').

Proof of the SAAF's unique approach to squadron naming can be seen at the official SAAF website, in all SAAF-produced documentation and in coverage of the SAAF by local aviation publications. It is not contested in any serious form, so the use of the 'No. x Squadron' format is most certainly incorrect. Please don't change any more SAAF squadron articles back to the incorrect format. Thank you, — Impi (talk) 19:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Royal Navy ship formatting

Hello Bushido, I received your message and let me tell you it is always nice to hear from a dedicated editor. I have seen your work around here and I am very impressed. I wish that there were more like you. You are right in regard to the format of the US ships in Wikipedia. To tell you the truth, I have no idea on how to develope a template which would recognize the italicizing of the ship names of the United Kingdom Royal Navy (alpha-numeric digits). This may be an interesting subject to take up with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. Have you done so already? Let me know if you find out anything new. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:VA-42

It is done. I went ahead and did what you requested. Verify and see if everything is in order. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		In recognition of your great work creating disambiguation pages for military units. Nick Dowling (talk) 03:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

10th Regiment of Foot

The rename may be necessary but how about (British Army) as disamb as the regiment started life in England, then Great Britain and then the UK as the UK evolved. Kernel Saunters (talk) 19:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually think on reflection the correct disamb would be 10th (North Lincoln) Regiment of Foot. Would you be OK for me to change it? Kernel Saunters (talk) 20:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

39th Battalion (Australia)

Hi Pen..,

Thank you for the change. Yes I agree, it needed to be done. Also thank you for your kind comments, I still have some work to fill in the WWII section. Best Regards Vufors (talk) 05:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bombardment of Lowestoft and Yarmouth

Hi. I have just finished a run through editing this article adding information from a couple of other sources. You may want to have a look. I think it likely the account which you uploaded was based largely on the memoirs of Admiral Reinhard Scheer available at [1]. As such, this 1920's account was a little one-sided. There are still a few facts floating about which I can't source. (this is not to be taken as criticism for loading it: we have to start somewhere)Sandpiper (talk) 17:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To respond in kind: I notice various articles consistently use am or AM or a.m. or 15.00 etc and I havn't figured which is correct. ditto its not so much whether I prefer capitals as what its generally supposed to be. There is a big style guide somewhere suggesting minimal use of capitals, but many people stick them in wherever possible. The article isn't finished and corresponds to my general editing principle of facts first and sort out my bad typing after. This is made worse by uncertainty over which to use! There is a similar poster on the [Raid on Scarborough, Hartlepool and Whitby] page, so someone else got the idea first: I was thinking of finding a zepelin, but havn't managed a relevant picture of a real one. Also there are lots of pictures of seydlitz damaged after Jutland, but I havn't found one of the mine damage. It still really wants something like a contemporary picture of the towns attacked.

As to context, I think several of these battle articles lack context: The books on the subject do much better and set things in their time and in other events, but we risk missing this because each article is a bit isolated on just its own topic. I have been trying to make them flow together better with background about events. Similarly, trying to get some biography on the main officers concened on each side. I am still a bit bothered by some of ths stuff in Scheer's account: it was written close to the events by someone with a case to make about how well he did/justify his actions, so although it is interesting to get a first hand view from the German side he might have not have been completely truthfull? The other sources are in English, and while they ough to be unbiased accounts, there is that problem about victors writing the offical history. But thank you for your comments.Sandpiper (talk) 06:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of John Bobo (disambiguation)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is John Bobo (disambiguation). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bobo (disambiguation). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re "Navy list"

Just for future reference (re this edit), U.S. Navy ships have their own Navy List article which is the Naval Vessel Register. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 06:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

I saw this edit and wish to make a comment. Redirects are not redundant links. The whole point of them is that often there is no one correct name for an article, and depending on circumstances, different names can be used. That is why we have redirects. For example First World War and World War I are just as valid as is Great War, or Third Reich and Nazi Germany, none of these links need to be "fixed". I have just finished writing an article on Archibald Douglas, 1st Earl of Ormond, for much of his life he was known by the title Archibald Douglas, Earl of Angus, so if one is writing an article that mentions the man before the creation of the Earldom of Ormond, then referring to him as "Earl of Angus" is correct and linking to the article via that redirect is the correct thing to do. It is also the most practical as the spelling of Ormonde [sic] varies from source to source.

Anyway I think you could make more useful contributions to the project than changing links like Second World War to "[[World War II|Second World War]]" as redirects are cheap and work efficiently. -- PBS (talk) 03:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

40th Regiment

Hi, I saw you reverted my changes to 40th Regiment. Although it looks strange, that's actually the proper syntax for intentional disambiguation links per WP:INTDABLINKS. If you don't like its appearance, you could always pipe the links to get the look you prefer; but please, don't just revert it. Thanks, --JaGa^talk 13:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason we make intentional links to disambiguation pages redirect through "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects is so those pages do not show up on the list of pages needing repair. Edits like this one only create additional work for disambiguators, and I would appreciate if you would fix any such links you have made. bd2412 T 15:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Nickel

Just thought you'd be interested. I saw a newspaper article about V-J Day or, more specifically, one of several military units known as the Triple Nickels. Finding out how Wikipedia covered the Triple Nickels proved much more complicated than I thought. It seems there were several different redirects depending on how the term was spelled. And no redirects for the plural forms. Since there were several units, I concluded a disambiguation page was called for.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 16:35, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Charles EH Parker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Charles EH Parker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:59, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jpg Gnr Lodge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jpg Gnr Lodge.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:12, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pen of bushido. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Amerossa listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amerossa. Since you had some involvement with the Amerossa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Edmund Phipps-Hornby.jpg

The file File:Edmund Phipps-Hornby.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]