User talk:Pegship/Archive2020

Please assume good faith.

Category:United States internet company stubs has been nominated for discussion

Category:United States internet company stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 10:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk archival

Hey and long time no see! I just happened to notice that in your most recent user talk archival, you moved the page to User talk:ArchiveSept2019, aka the talkpage of the fictional user ArchiveSept2019. I'm going to guess you intended to move it to User talk:Pegship/ArchiveSept2019 as with your other archives? AddWittyNameHere 01:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

indeed! Error corrected. (I hope.)

Seems fixed now, yes. Other than the lack of signature on the above comment, anyway.

AddWittyNameHere 22:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Library-logo-blue-plastic.png

The file File:Library-logo-blue-plastic.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Library-logo-shadow.png

The file File:Library-logo-shadow.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Library-logo-white.png

The file File:Library-logo-white.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Library-logo-white-reverse.png

The file File:Library-logo-white-reverse.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst (talk) 03:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Category Barnstar

I've remastered your 2007 barnstar and added it to Template:The Category Barnstar. I know there was a Categorization Barnstar, but I thought your design was way better. I've added both templates @Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories. Jerm (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stub categories

Hello, I have not worked much in the stub category creation and related work so far. However, I miss some stub categories every now and then when I work on stub-sorting. These are mostly non-controversial, and mostly related to India. For example, there are 30+ states in India, however a few states are missing here: Category:India stubs by state or union territory (and hence subcategories as well). Should I propose stub categories/templates Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals as Speedy/General after doing precheck.
Could I guide me a little while I try to explore this area? Regards, --Titodutta (talk) 23:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Titodutta (talk · contribs) - Hello, and thanks for asking. Firstly, if you decide a stub type is needed, by all means propose it at the project page. Secondly, I'm not sure why some states are missing from Category:India stubs by state or union territory, unless perhaps there are not enough articles to create a sub-category for a particular state/territory. In that case, an upmerged template for a state could be created, but project guidelines are not to create a stub category for a template until the template is used on more than 60 articles. Does this information help at all? Her Pegship (I'm listening) 23:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AdrianMessengerVHS.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AdrianMessengerVHS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:COVID-19 stubs has been nominated for discussion

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_17#Category:COVID-19_stubs. – Fayenatic London 08:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

Do you belongs to bamanhat Arghadwip sarkar (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"O (star trek)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect O (star trek). Since you had some involvement with the O (star trek) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 19:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nepal-geo-stub

Your Pegship, {{Mechi-geo-stub}} is now orphaned. And {{Terhathum-geo-stub}} needs to be moved to {{Tehrathum-geo-stub}}. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also wanted to ask you if there is a way to check if there are red geo-stub templates in mainspace. I have started using AWB, and I am worried I might miss a typo and accidentally put an article into a non-existing geo-stub. Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Also orphaned {{Dhawalagiri-geo-stub}}, {{Seti-geo-stub}} and {{Mahakali-geo-stub}}. Last of the bunch, I think. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Nepal Barnstar of National Merit
		Thank you for your diligent work organising thousands of stubs on Nepal's geography—for hours of research and homework it must have needed, dozens of new templates and categories that needed creating, and thousands of edits adding them to the articles. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/966215763/next

Is the nominator supposed to create the category? If yes, how is he even meant to notice his discussion was closed? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, @1234qwer1234qwer4:! If the nom prefers that someone else create the category, they may just say so as part of the proposal, or contact someone who seems to be active in that area. Also, using the "watch this page" function when making a proposal will normally give someone a heads-up when the discussion is closed. Her Pegship (I'm listening) 22:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of thanks!

		The Stub Barnstar
		Thanks for helping me in my first foray into the mysteries of stub creation, upmerging, and categorisation! Greatly appreciated. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Check stub template and category

Hi Pegship,

I have created the template and category for pyrotechnics stubs as was approved at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2020/June#Pyrotechnics stub by a big amount of votes ;-) I think I have done it correctly, but , if you have time, I'll appreciate if you could check it. Thank you. Alexcalamaro (talk) 06:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I just now noticed the PetScan query linked in the proposal returned all the articles about pyrotechnics, not just the stubs. I think the created stub category (only 9 articles) should better be upmerged for now. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 1234qwer1234qwer4, if you check the "Templates &links" label, you'll see that in templates box is selected asbox , this means that the article has the stub template in it. Depending on the Depth selected in Categories label, we have 40 articles for depth=1 to 126 articles for depth=10. Alexcalamaro (talk) 08:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexcalamaro: Oh, I'm very sorry. Still, it seems many of these don't quite fit the pyrotechnics stub cat, especially the rocketry stubs. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You are right, lets see how many of them appear to properly fit and decide. Alexcalamaro (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technology manufacturing companies established in 2014

Please see my proposal to upmerge Category:Technology manufacturing companies established in 2014 to Category:Electronics companies established in 2014 Hugo999 (talk) 01:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

art stub

Drat. I had convinced myself that it was {{Art stub}} and when that didn't work, I put in an ordinary stub as a place-holder, planning to go find out who broke it. <blush> --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! :D Her Pegship (?) 23:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2007

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2007 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2008

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2008 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2009

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2009 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2010

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Proposals 2010 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sports seasons and bulk deletions

Hi Pegship,

If you have any time, I would appreciate it if you could bring your knowledge to this discussion.

I was hoping to solve a problem of excessive deletionism which is based on poor arguments and evidence, but it's becoming the same go-nowhere debate as on the Deletion pages - it really needs an outside view.
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sports seasons and bulk deletions / nuisance nominations

Best wishes, Demokra (talk) 19:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Sfp create

Template:Sfp create has been nominated for merging with Template:Sfp top. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La isla misteriosa y el capitán Nemo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La isla misteriosa y el capitán Nemo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La isla misteriosa y el capitán Nemo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: How do I do it??

Hi, I use AWB for most of the sorting I do. For some of the more complicated sorting I use a javascript tool, that I came across years ago and no longer understand that lets me change stub tags, it allows me to select stub tags for the article. I also use petscan to create lists which helps. Waacstats (talk) 18:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]