User talk:Peetred

Welcome!

Hello, Peetred, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 14:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geograph images

You may not be aware that Geograph images actually have their own template that indicates the proper copyright licencing. You should add that together with the full description of the image as I have done for you with File:TarringHighStreet.JPG. It makes life much easier if uploaders will fill out all the info, so they don't need to be tagged as missing something. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Worthing

Hi Peetred; thanks for your contributions to Worthing and subsidiary articles—they are proving to be very useful! As you may have noticed, I have recently started a major overhaul of the article. I've just noticed your creation of Connaught Theatre, which is looking good; after finishing St Mary's Church, Goring-by-Sea (which I have coincidentally just started) I shall expand it using the sources I have ~~to add~~to hand. One thing I noticed: you refer to it as a listed building, but I can't find any record of that on English Heritage's Listed Buildings database or in Worthing Borough Council's official list. Do you have a reference suggesting it is listed? (It wouldn't surprise me if it was, but it will need further investigation if that is the case.) Let me know at my talk page. Anyway, for now, I'll upload a picture I took a few months ago to add to the infobox. Cheers, Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 21:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again – thanks for your note. For my question about the listing, I meant the Connaught, not St Mary's (sorry, my wording was rather vague). Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 14:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I have nominated the Connaught Theatre article to appear on the Did You Know? section of the main page; if successful, the fact I've picked out (see here) will appear on the Main Page for a few hours, hopefully encouraging readers to "click through" and read the whole article. You'll receive a notification here if it is successful. (I found a useful source on Friday, and have added more info today.) Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 23:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Connaught Theatre

On December 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Connaught Theatre, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Titnore Wood

Hi – nice start on Titnore Wood; I may be able to expand further with info I have at home. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 12:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was surprisingly little info in my various Worthing book sources at home, but I'm going to the library tomorrow so may be able to find more. In the meantime I've found some more online refs. We have enough of a start to merit a Did You Know? nomination, which if successful would hopefully drive further expansion and improvements. I'll see what I can do! Good work on Sussex dialect, by the way: that's one of my particular areas of interest, so it was interesting to see it appear. Again, I may have some more info in some of my books. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:10, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sussex dialect

Nice job on this article! I've just nominated it as an April Fool's Did you know at Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 15:30, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on a job well done! Dr Aaij (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Titnore Wood

On March 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Titnore Wood, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 09:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sussex dialect

On April 1, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sussex dialect, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:PinterAmbrose.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PinterAmbrose.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation markup

Please take more care to get citation markup right. Every time you've edited Sussex recently, you've made basic markup errors and left them for somebody else to clean up. That's not polite, and it damages the usefulness of the article.

There's still a citation problem in Sussex that's going to need you to fix: when you added the section on Norman Sussex, you included two footnote markers saying <ref name="seward5"/>, but you provided no definition of "seward5". (There's a whopping great error message in large red letters in the references section. Do you not look after you add citations?) —Paul A (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, that was impolite. I've been doing a lot of clean-up lately, and you got to be the straw that broke the camel's back. I'm sorry. —Paul A (talk) 01:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm sure we all have those days sometimes. Peetred (talk) 23:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Goring

Thanks for taking and uploading the pics of Castle Goring. Hopefully a new use can be found soon for the building! Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:19, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks Hassocks5489, I couldn't agree more! Peetred (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine work

		The Original Barnstar
		Superb work creating, editing, and improving articles. TeaDrinker (talk) 20:32, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:CastleGoringWithCoaches.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Music of Sussex page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brighton/Worthing/Littlehampton

If you wish to move this article to Brighton and Hove Built-up Area, you must do it using the move tab. If this doesn't work, use the WP:RM process. Please do not cut the text and paste it elsewhere, as this is deemed to be a cut & paste move, and is not compliant with WP:GFDL. Cheers, Number 5 7 22:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 9 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Geography of Sussex page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sussex Police and Crime Panel

The article Sussex Police and Crime Panel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable local council committee. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sussex

Hello Peetred! You are invited to join WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Sussex in South East England. Come and join us! Seagull123 Φ 20:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC) [reply]What is a WikiProject? • Come and join us! • Sussex Portal

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sport in Sussex

I have removed part of your addition to the above article, as it appears to have been copied directly from http://www.pga.info/regions/england-(south)/counties/sussex/about-us.aspx, a copyright web page. — Diannaa (talk) 01:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015-16 Sussex Senior Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Historic county. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sussex Senior Challenge Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Leonards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Peetred. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for creating the new Sussex wine article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Worthing Downland Estate article

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I've checked and I can't find any use of this term, "Worthing Downland Estate", through searching Google Books or news articles - I just see mention of the land but it doesn't seem to have any specific name. The sources just call it "Cissbury Ring land", "Cissbury downland", "council land" or something generic like that. The only source I can find on Google that uses this name is a self-published blog.

Sorry for being so pedantic, but it's important to ensure we don't have misleading information or made-up words on Wikipedia. Blythwood (talk) 23:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blythwood, thanks for your message, glad you read the article. This downland is close to, but not part of Cissbury - hence I think having Cissbury in the title would be misleading. It is however within the borough of Worthing and is owned by Worthing Borough Council - so I think "Worthing Downland" or "Worthing Downland Estate" is a more meaningful name for the land under discussion (c.f. Eastbourne Downland Estate) --Peetred (talk) 20:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Peetred. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Battle of South Street) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Battle of South Street, Peetred!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your very informative new article on the Battle of South Street.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:56, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Peetred. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Semple 2013"

Hi Peetred, just over four years ago, in this edit of Kingdom of Sussex, you added references to a source "Semple 2013", but you did not add the item being cited – can you fix this? Looking online, I suspect you may have been citing Semple, S. (2013), Perceptions of the Prehistoric in Anglo-Saxon England [etc.], but if so I don't have access to this book – there's a preview at Google Books, but as usual it's not showing me the relevant pages. Thanks. Nortonius (talk) 16:08, 27 November 2018 (UTC) Hi Nortonius, yes this is the right book. Now updated. Thanks.[reply]

Great, thank you! But, now that I look again, I notice that there's also a citation to "Semple 2003", at the end of the first sentence in the sub-section "Kingship" – sorry, I wish I'd noticed it before! Would I be right in guessing that this is a simple typo for another instance of "Semple 2013"? Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 20:45, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you spotted another typo here. The ref you found refers to the 2013 book, so I've corrected it. Thanks again.

Excellent! Nortonius (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Great article creation in 'cricket in Sussex'! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 23:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Football in Sussex) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Football in Sussex.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Epic task - well done!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chichester

Some items you were introducing seemed good, others seemed problematic. As the lede did not seem to be an overall improvement I reverted it. There was an element of non-preparedness in your edits, no indication of where you were going. thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big Air Open Kitesurfing Classic

The article Big Air Open Kitesurfing Classic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This seems to have been a one-off event. There is some local coverage but it is fairly routine.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tacyarg (talk) 12:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Sussex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ralph Ellis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Another Paradise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Another Paradise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Paradise until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind about the nomination at the last second, having noticed that there were mentions of the film at Sabrina Jean, and thus I've decided to boldly convert it to a redirect. If you would like to discuss this further you can revert the change. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primary Urban Area, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages University of Newcastle and Chatham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating English Martyrs' Catholic Church, Goring-by-Sea. It's an important article and a great job! Cardofk (talk) 08:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Regni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ouse and Trundle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]