User talk:Pediabywiki

This is Pediabywiki's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trinity Saioo (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trinity Saioo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pediabywiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 21:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Trinity Saioo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Trinity Saioo. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Saioo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Trinity Saioo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and ridiculous sourcing needs to be sorted and also neutral tone. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 17:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Pooja Sharma Rekha Phto.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pooja Sharma Rekha Phto.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP moving articles about

A Son of Himalaya was tagged for WP:AFD you cannot move it back to draft. Theroadislong (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, Pediabywiki, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Pediabay (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aaditrie Dipika moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aaditrie Dipika. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Coop (talk) 07:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aaditrie Dipika has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aaditrie Dipika. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaditrie Dipika (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

zero improvement since draftifying?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaditrie Dipika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aaditrie Dipika

Hello, Pediabywiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aaditrie Dipika, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aaditrie Dipika

Hello, Pediabywiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Aaditrie Dipika".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]