User talk:Pecanfarm

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Julia Suits. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 13:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no way of knowing that you are really the articles subject, but in any case the first line of an article should describe what the person does and education references are standard content for any articles? Teapotgeorge^Talk 13:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the content was sourced from a publicly accessible website on which the subject is biographied, the content removed from the page is unjustifiable. For more justifiable excusions, see Wikipedia's policy on privacy for biographies of living persons.--Lhakthong (talk) 18:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the user is the subject of the article under discussion, she may also be interested in Wikipedia's policies regarding the subject of an article and the article itself.--Lhakthong (talk) 18:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pecanfarm, I moved your discussion to its chronologically appropriate place on my page, at the bottom. Just didn't want you to miss it. If you click the "star" tab at the top of my talk page, it will be added to you watchlist, and you will be notified of any change (including my responses) on my talk page via your watchlist (see upper right corner of this window). When our conversation is over, you can un-star it (thus removing it from your watchlist).--Lhakthong (talk) 18:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Julia Suits, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. With your clear conflict of interest, please take any required edits to the talk page first. Teapotgeorge^Talk 19:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]