User talk:Pebblefire

Welcome!

Hello, Pebblefire, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jennifer sichel, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Margaretver (talk) 05:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jennifer sichel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jennifer sichel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Margaretver (talk) 05:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved

Hi Pebblefire. I'm Mz7, one of the other editors here, and I wanted to let you know that the issue raised above with the Jennifer sichel article was most likely a misunderstanding. It has now been resolved, and the Jennifer Sichel article most likely will not be deleted. Thank you so much for your contributions to Wikipedia! Please let me know if you have any questions; you can contact me on my talk page. Mz7 (talk) 06:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Pebblefire, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Jennifer Sichel have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Some of the content in the article too closely matched the text found at http://www.teamusa.org/para-rowing/athletes/Jenny-Sichel and http://www.usrowing.org/bio/jenny-sichel/, so I have removed it. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 06:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Pebblefire, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Mz7 (talk) 06:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Teachers College, Columbia University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Your addition to Teachers College, Columbia University has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teachers College, Columbia University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Dodge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicious Account & Possible New IP Addresses of the Notorious "RabidMelon" (Blocked Account)

This account (User:Pebblefire) may be the possible re-appearance of the notorious User:RabidMelon which had controlled (confirmed & blocked) around 10 sock puppet accounts . User:RabidMelon account had been blocked indefinitely earlier this year by administrator Bbb23, and what's more it was first blocked in 2010 (but was somehow unblocked in 2011). However, earlier this year (2017) a new account User:Pebblefire was created and several IP addresses based on New York (probably Bronx) are possibly linked with this account:

74.108.157.211, 74.108.156.96, 74.108.153.85

Upon preliminary review, much of the editing behavior & language of User:Pebblefire and the possibly related IP addresses highly resemble that of the blocked account User:RabidMelon and its sock puppets. Like the old account User:RabidMelon, the new account User:Pebblefire along with the possibly related IP addresses seem to belong to some individual related to Columbia University. For a direct instance, in the talk page (User talk:74.108.157.211), the following claim was made:

"...because I work at Columbia, the fancy, big name school reputation must also give me equal knowledge in Wikipedia policies and I should just "know" how to figure my way around the website is absolutely absurd! Perhaps the big name is a great smoke screen as to showing you that not every staff member, student, or faculty is a genius at an Ivy League institution that there are a wide variety of expertise in different fields. When it comes to HTML related internet activities, I consider myself a beginner. "

This looks like a big lie. The user seems like an "experienced" Wikipedia editor, but often in disguise. He/she appears fairly aggressive at some places and fairly "reasonable" at other places. Finally, this is not a formal accusation against anyone, but a serious warning that the activities of User:Pebblefire and the possibly related IP addresses are being closely watched. 205.208.120.58 (talk) 18:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pebblefire. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nutrition Lab TC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nutrition Lab TC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chemistry at TC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chemistry at TC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Danielle Hansen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aiguebelette

Jaclyn Smith (rower) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aiguebelette

Jennifer Sichel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aiguebelette

Zachary Burns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aiguebelette

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pebblefire. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding affiliates in the drop-down box

Hi Pebblefire. Recently you have made changes to Columbia University's article and added Teachers College under the dropdown box of graduate/professional schools, which I reverted back to the original revision. While you are correct that it is part of the greater Columbia Community, adding affiliates in the box straight-up is a subject of debate (many believing that it should be there with the word affiliate in parentheses, many believing that the word affiliate diminishes it's identity so you can't do that, and many believing that it should not be included etc.). I don't know if you followed the conversations of the talk page, but the same went for the other affiliates as well, so this is not specific to Teachers College. The consensus is to include only Columbia's schools in the drop-down boxes retrieved from the official website [1] "three undergraduate schools, thirteen graduate and professional schools, a world-renowned medical center, four affiliated colleges and seminaries." I specifically tried to contribute a lot to improve all the schools' presence in the article. All the schools including Teacher's College is very well represented under the appropriate sections :) (Nochorus (talk) 22:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Nochorus, I appreciate your input, but that information simply isn't true. The original argument was to take off "(affiliate)" but was not to take off the schools completely. When I created the drop down menu for the undergraduate schools, the administrators agreed that the best course of option was to include "all or nothing" as in all affiliates are either taken off or added on. The discussion was that, as you stated, "(affiliate)" is to be removed because some users felt that it isolated those members as part of the Columbia community. The other discussion was whether to do "all" or "nothing." The agreement was reached to include "all" because it is the most consistent with primary sources, namely, the charters and statues from the Board of Trustees of Columbia University.

Even more so, Teachers College varies from other affiliates in that the college awards Ph.Ds. These Ph.Ds are actually conferred by the Columbia Graduate School of Arts & Sciences as a doctorate in education (even though the academic syllabus and research is done at TC). Furthermore, Teachers College is not only a Faculty unit of Education (like Barnard the JTS), but it is an official Department of the University as the Department of Education (as cited again, in BOTH the faculty handbook and the charters and statues amendments) because no other school in the Columbia umbrella awards degrees in education. Lastly, Teachers College is governed by the Committee on the Master of Arts in Education, which other affiliates are not. This committee is precisely what allows TC to award education degree under the Columbia name (other affiliates do not have this because they have repeated subjects that is also represented in the College, i.e. BA in Sociology at Barnard vs BA in Sociology at Columbia College). We cannot keep having the same debate over and over and over again. This has been happening for a few years now and new editors keep coming in attempting to change it. This edit should be locked.Pebblefire (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for socking

I've blocked you indefinitely for again socking with IPs.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]