User talk:PeaceTrainee
(edit conflict) I'm responding to your post that you just removed. No, you have no history at all, with this account. What's your main account? Why would I be in a sympathetic relationship with an indefinitely blocked editor I have never had any contact with? Please show sooner rather than later that you're here to help create an encyclopedia, or this obvious sock will be blocked. "Inviting" me to stay off your talkpage won't cut it; I'm supposed to warn before I block. Bishonen | talk 20:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC).
- No sock here. Just a person who doesn't like to be threatened. As my handle would suggest, I seek no conflict and will engage in none. As for Eaglestorm, yes, I admit that, in reading through his background of uncivility and edit-warring, I thought I'd leave something seemingly benign on his talk page. Although it acknowledged his past indiscretions, it did call for others not to engage in similar behavior. However, although it was not "character assassination" as you claimed hyperbolically, it also was not in the best taste and I do apologize for that. It is my hope to get along with others on here and that, when I do run into uncivil people who insist on edit-warring, I can count on you to back me up. That is all. Thanks for listening.PeaceTrainee (talk) 20:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
PeaceTrainee, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi PeaceTrainee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC) |
April 2017
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Matt Gaetz are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 17:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Note
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--NeilN talk to me 17:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cleavage (breasts) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cleavage (breasts) was changed by PeaceTrainee (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866463 on 2017-05-06T21:31:09+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add your personal opinions or beliefs in a Wikipedia article. Famspear (talk) 22:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 23:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)