User talk:Pcj

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Welcome!

Hello, Pcj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jibbles | Talk 08:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Space Quest

Thanks for the warning about spelling, however you'll notice that the edit was from 5 days ago and has already been reverted and I've already spoken to someone about it. Please be more careful before issuing outdated warnings. Jibbles | Talk 08:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WOW

I recommend you use the history button and see who actually added that link. I first corrected the grammer for it, and then went to the site to see if it was accurate. It wasn't correct and I went back to delete it but you beat me to it. I would much appreciate a correction to my user Talk Page. Bignole 17:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Presley - Edits

Hi. Thank you for your message. My apologies for editing the Presley page akin to a vandal. I am concerned, however, that it's basically been hijacked by a fringe agenda pushed by one user and one user only. If you see the discussion section of the page you can see that it is on its 14th itiration which suggests that this issue simply won't go away. While I'll refrain from editing as much as possible the entire experience is souring my view on Wikipedia which is a shame as it is an otherwise brilliant resource. --Lochdale 22:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right in that I should follow the proper protocols. I just am frustrated as I believe I'm been asked to prove a negative. The amusing thing is that I am not even much of a fan of Presley but I just don't think he deserves an article like that nor does such a fringe article do anything but hurt the reputation of Wikipedia. I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm going to go look up mediation!--Lochdale 22:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While this was written in jest it does go to the genuine credibility issue Wikipedia will have if standards are not maintained. --Lochdale 20:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note regarding user Onefortyone's suspension. I am a little bit at a loss, however, as to how to respond. In one sense I am annoyed at some of his assertions against me but on the other hand I am thinking it's not worth responding. Further, how should I go about editing the article or should I just leave it alone entirely? Thanks for all your help. --Lochdale 19:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Raph Kostner; Educational research; Power Pad; Section (military unit); Hellfire Citadel; Famicom BASIC; Henry Manne; World of Warcraft Launcher; Bill LaFortune; Black Temple; Dark Portal; Horde (Warcraft); Tempest Keep; Self-loathing; Wayman Tisdale; Transform and lighting; Bow shock; Newaukum River; Auchindoun

Cleanup: Razorfen Kraul; William H. Murray; Nineveh
Merge: There's a hole in the bucket; Geometric precession; Ides of March
Add Sources: List of proven conspiracies; Napoleon complex; Resident Evil 4 (film)
Wikify: Green Country/temp; Oklahoma Libertarian Party; Nation-building
Expand: Foreign worker; Eastern Kingdoms; Carl Radle

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barbossa

This is regarding the edit in the Dead Man's Chest article.

Barbossa is shot by Jack Sparrow before Will Turner actually drops the coins into the chest. Barbossa says that he "feels", and yes, he drops to the ground, PRESUMED dead. This is why he returns in the second film. Barbossa was simply shot BEFORE the curse was actually lifted. Please watch the first film again at that point.

Louiemantia 14:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If he is "dead", you must still realize that the coins were dropped AFTER Barbossa was shot, so the edits I did made were correct. I am not saying he didn't die, I'm not saying he did either. I'm stating the facts. He was shot before the curse was lifted. Those are the changes I made. Factual.

Louiemantia 14:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Vandal Tags

Sorry for not putting warning tags on users more. I do it mostly to repeat offenders, and at that point normally put the "this is the only warning you recieve" tag up there. That, and it seems that the few I have gone to tag with warnings have been already done. Again, my apologies if this has caused undue stress, just trying to live up to some of the better reverters out there. Galactor213 19:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia in Quenya

Hello, Pcj! There is a voting at Meta for opening a Wikipedia in Quenya. Perhaps you would like to vote: here.
Meanwhile, there is a test Wikipedia in Quenya started at the Incubator: here. I bet you would like to participate. :)

Hope to see you there, --Djordje D. Bozovic 12:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Presley

Just thought you might be interested in the Presley article which has been heavily edited again. Lochdale 22:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Elvisstamp.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Elvisstamp.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Elvisstamp.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Elvisstamp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wowpedia

Pcj, is there a link/source that shows how many WoWWiki editors have followed to Wowpedia? —MJBurrage^(T•C) 17:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The new user log lists account reclamations. --pcj (talk) 18:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shirik has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 15:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mark Crowe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ken Williams and Earthsiege

Scott Murphy (video game designer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ken Williams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pcj. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pcj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pcj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adventure Classic Gaming

The article Adventure Classic Gaming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:WEBCRIT. The website has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domeditrix (talk) 11:47, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Two Guys From Andromeda logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Two Guys From Andromeda logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Freedom Games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

OceanHok (talk) 05:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freedom Games logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freedom Games logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]