User talk:Domeditrix

Max Fosh

Hi there, I've removed the PROD for this one as its previous PROD deletion makes it ineligible. You may wish to take it to WP:AfD, though. The creator recreating the article after its deletion counts as 'contesting the deletion'. For what it's worth, I don't think Fosh is notable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

@Spiderone: Thanks, I wasn't aware of that rule. I thought a successfully PROD-ded article could be re-PRODded, and that only articles that had a previously contested PROD could not. Domeditrix (talk) 14:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Niko Omilana

In case you hadn't noticed, Niko Omilana has been recreated. The article isn't the same as the old, so speedy deletion does not seem to apply, but could go to a new AfD. It doesn't seem to me that the new article demonstrates notability. Bondegezou (talk) 10:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

This is exactly why I supported WP:SALTing the first time around.... argh! I'll create the AFD some time this week (if nobody else does first). The vast majority of sources for the new article are identical. The only 'new' ones are either links to his YouTube videos, or routine election coverage - an interview from Insider, two pieces written about his run by students at Tiffin School, and a piece stating where he finished by Complex UK. There is one very short 'interview' by Joe.co.uk, but its length is so short that it's unsuitable for establishing notability. I'd argue that as the reason for the original redirect clearly hasn't been remedied, that the page remains substantially identical in substance to the deleted page, and that a speedy deletion (per WP:G4) may be appropriate. I don't feel so certain on that, though, so I'll probably just take it to AFD. If you feel like doing it too, feel free to. Domeditrix (talk) 13:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

It may not stick, but I have tried just boldly reverting the article to being a redirect. Bondegezou (talk) 14:00, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Soccerbase and Soccerway

We do - but not when they are used in-line already, see WP:ELNO, which I did refer you to here. GiantSnowman 16:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Then I have a lot of editing to do. Domeditrix (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

You need to explain your edits, and you should not embark on some crusade to remove all external links, see WP:POINT. GiantSnowman 20:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Can you please just explain what I actually did wrong? Because as I've said previously, if it is an issue then I don't see it as WP:POINTy to correct the issue across a range of articles, rather than letting errors stand. Domeditrix (talk) 20:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Easy Allies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Easy Allies, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Allies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)