User talk:Pcaabplroa
|
Possibly unfree File:John hanlon.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John hanlon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
File source problem with File:John hanlon.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:John hanlon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:John hanlon.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:John hanlon.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sumanch (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Jayron32 05:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:38, 17 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglas Messerli
[edit]
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 08:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 17:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
- Also:
- I added a response to the Make "multiple issues" box go away discussion. ~Eric F 74.60.29.141 (talk) 18:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello again,
To improve the article's layout, I'd suggest breaking it down into sections. Since the article is a biography, a 'Biography' section isn't necessary. There are some good guidelines in the "Welcome" template (at the top of this talk page), but it might be easier to find an article for somebody with a similar career to use as an example. Perhaps include sub-sections for things like 'Writing' / 'Publishing', etc. (?). ~Anyway, just a suggestion, ~Eric F 74.60.29.141 (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
John_Hanlon
[edit]
Message added SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Or, to save you the trip: I processed the OTRS permission, restored the image and added it back to John Hanlon (record producer). --SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The Teahouse Turns One!
[edit]It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!
|
Teahouse First Birthday Badge |
| Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. |
- --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Property (Malibu artists colony) (December 28)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Property (Malibu artists colony) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Pcaabplroa,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! j⚛e deckertalk 22:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 9)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pcaabplroa/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Sorry it was rejected
[edit]Hey, You probably saw the messages on my Talk page or I may have told you this already, sorry if I'm repeating myself but last week I had major surgery on my spinal column. When the surgeon first described to me what they wanted to do my take away was "well we chop your head off and then reconnect it correctly". It wasn't QUITE that bad of course but almost. They opened up my throat from the front and then did all kinds of mucking around with the bones in my spinal column. The bones were pinching on the nerves which was causing all kinds of problems. I always think of computer analogies, the spinal column is kind of like the network bus card in your computer it takes input and sends output to just about everything. I was losing my ability to walk and other things that are even more important like, well lets just say like what I'm sure got done a lot at the colony ;-) Anyway, back to Wikipedia, just keep in mind I'm on massive pain killers still so I may forget things you've said before or may not reply as quickly as I used to. I saw the rejection, I think you can still make it if you aren't disgusted yet. The last one was filled with stuff like "not notable", etc. This one just said that it wasn't clear what the article was about. In fact I feel bad I didn't catch it before hand but I think that shows why its important to have different eyes look at the same page, I was getting so used to the idea that it didn't jump out at me but he is correct we have a poor lead section. It should start off very clearly saying something like "The property was the name for an artist colony located at X and lasting from A to B. It was home as well as a stopping point for many famous artists and actors of the 70's including..." If I was feeling better this morning I would take a shot at rewriting the lead but I'm just not up for it. I suggest you review this article: Lead_paragraph and then ask me any questions. Then try the rewrite yourself and I'll take a look. It wouldn't hurt to reach out to the reviewer either. I still want to help just understand I'm still not at full strength yet. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 14:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi MadScientistX11, I had no idea about your surgery. Sorry you had to go through this! I'm amazed that you're kind enough to continue helping me. I totally understand if it becomes too much, and I will try to do all the work myself. I took your advice and wrote a new lead paragraph, User:Pcaabplroa/sandbox. Then I added my new reference to the end of the article with an inline citation. Finally, I wrote to the reviewer who rejected my article, informing him of the changes I made, and asking him if he thought my article would be accepted if I resubmitted it now. --Pcaabplroa (talk) 08:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- MadScientistX11, the article was accepted, The Property (artists colony)!!! Thanks for helping me learn how to write and submit it correctly. I couldn't have done it without you. Get well soon! --Pcaabplroa (talk) 06:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Property (artists colony) has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Onel5969 (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Rolnik, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Jewish Journal and Yayla. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Pcaabplroa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pcaabplroa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green Integer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ingram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of My Back Pages: Reviews and Essays
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on My Back Pages: Reviews and Essays requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://zerogrampress.com/2016/11/02/my-back-pages. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Diannaa. I've rewritten the page so it's not so similar to the website. The website and image do belong to me, and I will follow up with your link on Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to learn how to add the book cover that I designed there. (Pcaabplroa (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC))
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pcaabplroa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Thanks for creating Bob Zoell.
User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on Bob Zoell.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi Pcaabplroa! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Ways to improve A World with No Shore
[edit]Hello, Pcaabplroa,
Thank you for creating A World with No Shore.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This article needs more references. See WP:THREE. A WP:BEFORE (web) book search turned a number of reviews, which may be useful to you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 07:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Campbell (artist).jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Campbell (artist).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.jpg){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hi @B-bot. That image belongs with a page I created called Robert Campbell (artist), but I see now that the page has been removed. Can you please help me figure out why, and how I can get it back? Thank you! Pcaabplroa (talk) 03:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @B-bot.I improved the article Robert Campbell (artist) and reinstated it. Please don't delete the image!
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
CS1 error on Javier Marías
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Javier Marías, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Javier Marías
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Javier Marías, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Tom La Farge
- added a link pointing to New York
- Wendy Walker
- added a link pointing to New York
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)