Jump to content

User talk:Pbsouthwood/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15→Archive 20

Question

What are short descriptions, and where are they? Borrowing from a quote by Blaise Pascal, I will simply say...."I have made this short description longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter." 😂 Atsme✍🏻📧 18:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

I see you have read my short explanation above;-)
The short answer is: Read WP:Short description. It is also the long and reasonably complete answer, but you can skip the RfC's if you want to avoid the why and accompanying dramahfest.
The longer shortish answer is they are a feature imposed on Wikipedia by WMF, which can also be used for useful purposes on Wikipedia, which take the form of a short description of the topic of an article encased in a template in which a magic word is embedded which allows the short description text to be extracted independently of the rest of the content, like an associated database record, which WMF then use on the mobile app as a disambiguator for search results, or so I am told. We have them because we don't want them to use the Wikidata description associated with the article, which is unreliable and can be vandalised without anyone noticing unless they use mobile.
They are there in some articles, but they are not visible on desktop view unless you use CSS or Galobtter's nifty short description editing gadget, which requires loading to your js page. I use it all the time, and have the CSS as well, as it also shows short descriptions applied by other templates, like for disambiguation pages. I consider this to be a really valuable feature, and the main reason why I am writing so many myself. When all articles have one it will be a really useful tool for annotation.
They are also visible as an annotation to a wikilink if you use the {{annotated link}} template. You can see an example of that usage in Outline of underwater diving where all the annotations are called from the short descriptions of the articles in the lists.
I will stop now as it is getting past the point where I can claim it to have any vestige of brevity. Ask me if you want to know more. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Damn. I forgot to ping you Atsme. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Pbsouthwood, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal
Project updates
  • ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
  • There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
New scripts

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:NPOV dispute

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:NPOV dispute. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #021, 24 Oct 2018

Portals have passed the 4,000 mark.

More new portals...

Here's a list of portals created since the last issue

List of new portals

Please inspect these portals, report problems or suggest improvements at WT:WPPORTD, or develop them further (see below). Thank you.

What's next?

There is still lots to do...

There are many subject gaps that need to be filled. This can be done by creating new portals, or by adding Selected article sections to existing portals. To create a new portal, simply place {{subst:Basic portal start page}} on an empty portal page, and click "Preview". If the portal is complete, click "Save". After you try it, come share your experience and excitement at WT:WPPORTD.

Each new portal is just a starting point. Each portal of the new design can be further developed by:

  • refining the search parameters to improve the results displayed in the Did you know and In the news sections.
  • adding more specific Selected articles sections, like Selected biographies.
  • inserting a Recognized content section.
  • adding more pictures to the image slideshow.
  • placing a panoramic picture at the top of the intro section (especially for geographic portals).

Besides the new portals, there are still about 1200 portals of the old design that need to be converted to the new design.

Many portals need to be de-orphaned, by placing links to them (in the See also section of the corresponding root articles, at the bottom of the corresponding navigation footer templates, and on the corresponding category pages).

Many of the new portals still need to be listed at Portal:Contents/Portals.

Bugs keep popping up in portals. These need to be tracked down and reported at WT:WPPORTD.

Tools are needed to make developing and maintaining portals quicker and easier.

Dreaming up new features and capabilities. Innovation needs to continue, to design the portal of tomorrow, and the portal development-maintenance-system of the future. Automation!

So, if you find yourself with a little (or a lot) of free time, pick an area (or more) above and...

...dive in!    — The Transhumanist   07:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

What is this?

In the See also section of Tantra you modified the links to:

  • annotated link|Bacchus
  • annotated link|Dionysus
  • annotated link|Neotantra
  • annotated link|Tantra massage

I haven't seen this before. What is it? Editor2020 (talk) 01:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Editor2020. It is a template that converts a plain wikilink into an annotated link. That is a link followed by an annotation drawn from the short description on the linked page. You can see this on Tantra where Dionysus already has a short description and it is displayed as an annotation to the link, while Neotantra does not yet have a short description so remains unannotated at this time. As soon as someone adds a short description to Neotantra, any annotated link to that page will automatically get the short description as an annotation. If the short description is improved, all annotated links to the article are automatically updated. The intention is to give the reader a better idea of whether the linked article will be useful to them before clicking on it. It is particularly effective in long lists like outline articles. See Outline of underwater diving for an example where almost all links have an annotation drawn from the short description.
You can read up on short descriptions at WP:Short description, and the template specifications are at {{annotated link}}. If there is anything else you would like to know about this, ask me, I might have an answer. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 04:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks!! - Editor2020 (talk) 20:30, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello.

I'm just informing you that the formatting you used for the short descriptions of the Moons of Jupiter and Neptune articles were inconsistent with each other and also with the Moons of Saturn and Uranus articles. I have edited their short descriptions so that all four match and are worded exactly the same way, just changing the planet's name. ― Дрейгорич / Dreigorich Talk 23:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Дрейгорич, No problem, short descriptions are like any other text. Anyone may improve or create them at any time. They do not have to be consistent, just correct and useful. Consistency within a group may be possible, and is OK as long as it does not conflict with other requirements, such as being verifiable in the article text. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 04:56, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Ding Dong!!

Trick or Treat!!!
Happy Halloween!
Why are demons and ghouls always together?
  • Because demons are a ghoul's best friend.

What happens when you goose a ghost?

  • You get a hand full of sheet.

Atsme✍🏻📧 00:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

<groan>... · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 03:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

If you agree

...with the removal of the unsourced sentence, moments ago, in teleology, please do what you can to support it. It is being described as a section blanking–it was a single sentence subsection, without any reference—and may be reverted immediately, as an edit from an un-logged editor. Cheers. 2601:246:CA80:3CB5:2135:4BEC:3A27:18E9 (talk) 18:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
  • A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
  • The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #022, 11 Nov 2018

Welcome AmericanAir88

Give a hearty welcome to AmericanAir88, who has adopted working on portals as one of his main purposes on Wikipedia. So far, he has created the following portals:

Way to go!

Where's Evad?

Evad disappeared from Wikipedia on October 18.

He has been, and will continue to be, sorely missed.

Hopefully, he is okay, on a Caribbean cruise or something.

The conversion continues

Portals of the old design, are slowly but surely being converted to the new single-page design.

One factor that has slowed things down is that for many sections, the section header call and section contents call are integrated into a template and buried in a lua module, locking them in on each portal. They have been that way for years.

This means that these sections can't be directly edited like the other sections on the same portal. So, search/replaces affect all the sections except those. So, upgrading headers on these portals, for example, misses the integrated sections and inadvertently results in 2 different header colors.

Before we can continue with the upgrade of these portals, the headers and section contents calls need to be restored to each portal, so that those can be edited in concert with the other sections on the portal, and worked on independently of each other.

This is underway, with a solution implemented on about 1/4 of the affected portals so far. Around 300 of them. The remaining 900 should be done within a couple weeks or so.

Going wide...

We now have banner-shaped pictures included in the introduction sections of 180 portals. The rarity of such pictures has made it difficult to find suitably narrow images for display across the tops of portals.

We have a solution for this, courtesy of FR30799386...

Most pictures are not banner-shaped. But, you can still use them as banners. Here's how:

{{Portal image banner|File:Blueberries .jpg |maxheight=120px |overflow=Hidden }}

Using both maxheight=120px and overflow=Hidden produces this:

Project's status

There are now 4,140 portals, with more being created almost daily. Prior to this project's reboot, portals were created at about the rate of 80 per year. Since April of this year, we've created about 2,600 new portals, or 32.5 years' worth at the old rate.

Of those new portals, about 3/4 of them need links leading to them. Almost all of them are linked to from the category system, but they still need links in article see also sections, at the bottom of navigation templates, and on the main portals list at Portal:Contents/Portals.

Of the 1500 portals created before the reboot, about 300 have been completely converted to the new design so far. About 1100 more have been partially converted, with intros, image slideshows, and associated wikimedia sections getting the most attention.

Discussion has resumed on the portal guidelines.

Until next issue...

See ya round the portal system!    — The Transhumanist   11:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Pbsouthwood,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
  • Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Body plan

I was surprised to see you edit-warring without so much as an edit comment. I don't like the portal bars all over the place, and said so clearly in the edit comment. For what it's worth, I think the small box less harmful than the enormous bar, but both are totally useless, just recycling existing materials in an auto-blog sort of way. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry Chiswick Chap, Not actually edit warring by intention. The section was still open in a tab and I just thought I had not finished the intended edits, so did not know you had reverted, and did not see your edit comment at all. Thanks for drawing this to my attention. I think the bar is less disruptive of the column structure in a see also section, but not strongly enough to argue the point if someone else doesn't like it. Apologies for putting you out. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 22:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pbsouthwood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #023, 25 Nov 2018

There are now 4,180 portals.

Will we break 5,000 by the end of the year?

I know we can. But, that is up to you!

( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or {{subst:bpsp}} )

Happy Holidays

Hello everyone! Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice (if it's occurring in your area of the world), and thanks for your work in maintaining, improving, and expanding portals. Cheers,    — The Transhumanist   06:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Jingling along

The following portals have been created since the last issue:

  1. Advanced Micro Devices
  2. Aqua Teen Hunger Force
  3. Aquatic ecosystems
  4. Blackberries
  5. Blade
  6. Blake and Mortimer
  7. Climate
  8. Democratic Party
  9. Dua Lipa
  10. Eels
  11. Eggs
  12. Emmy Awards
  13. Fallout
  14. Flutes and whistles
  15. Geophysics
  16. Ghost
  17. Hartford Whalers
  18. HBO
  19. Hot sauces
  20. International System of Units
  21. Jawaharlal Nehru
  22. Kendrick Lamar
  23. KFC
  24. Kingdom of England
  25. M.I.A.
  26. Marvel Comics
  27. Marvel Entertainment
  28. Minerals
  29. Mixed martial arts
  30. Money
  31. MTV
  32. Museums
  33. National Hockey League
  34. Natural resources
  35. Nature
  36. NBC
  37. Nehru–Gandhi family
  38. Orthoptera
  39. PATH
  40. Pears
  41. Physiology
  42. Ponds
  43. Pope Francis
  44. Potatoes
  45. Presidents of the United States
  46. Republican Party
  47. Salad dressings
  48. Santiago
  49. Six Flags
  50. Stan Lee
  51. Starbucks
  52. Stem cells
  53. Systems of measurement
  54. SZA
  55. The West Wing
  56. Tintin
  57. Tomato sauces
  58. Tove Lo
  59. Viticulture
  60. Waffles
  61. Wendy's
  62. White House
  63. Will Smith
  64. Winemaking

Keep 'em coming!

By the way, the above list was generated using this Petscan query. It can be easily modified by changing the date. The data page (under the Output tab) also has options for receiving the data in CSV or tabbed format, which some operating systems automatically load into a spreadsheet program for ease of use, such as copying and pasting the desired column (like page names).

In closing

We'll keep it short this issue.

Expect a flood next time. Or the one after that.

Cheerio,    — The Transhumanist   07:25, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Underwater work, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sling and Spreader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

Administrator changes

readded Al Ameer son • Randykitty • Spartaz
removed Boson • Daniel J. Leivick • Efe • Esanchez7587 • Fred Bauder • Garzo • Martijn Hoekstra • Orangemike

Interface administrator changes

removedDeryck Chan

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
  • Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Obituaries

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Adding multiple citations in Vis editor

Thanks for the note on my phabricator request from last year. There was not a way to ping you, so I just wanted to let you know that I responded. I do not have any strong feelings about naming references, but being able to add names in visual editor is something that I would definitely use. Thanks again, have a great day! JenOttawa (talk) 14:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

@JenOttawa:, you are welcome, I find the apparent indifference of WMF developers to the problems of Wikipedia editors both baffling and disturbing. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 14:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Darn, I meant to vote on the community wish list and missed it!! https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2019/Citations/VisualEditor:_Allow_references_to_be_named. JenOttawa (talk) 15:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Actually (not thanks to my help) it was voted #5 so I guess this may happen.[1] Sorry about all the messages! JenOttawa (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
I missed it too. So it goes. Fortunately enough people didn't miss it. #5 is a strong finish.
This is my talk page, I am fine with getting messages on it:-) Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 14:56, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

File:The Darkness Beckons.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Xmas

Merry Cristmas everybody!!!
Merry Cristmas everybody!!!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.


Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Ozzie10aaaa, Thank you for the kind thought. Regards, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 14:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Pbsouthwood,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.


Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.


Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Outline of underwater diving

Hi Pbsouthwood
I am totally lost as to how I am can remove mistakes from outlines, such as Outline of underwater diving - I have tried looking for the template referred to, but I cannot find it, probably because I am using the wrong syntax.
The problem is in Outline_of_underwater_diving#Repositories where the word "Reasearch" needs correcting to "Research" - I have searched for {{annotated link|Rubicon Research Repository}} but cannot find this
Please do not just correct this mistake, but please explain where this is, so I can deal with similar problems in the future - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 15:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arjayay. Annotated links (using {{annotated link}}) get the annotation from the linked page. The annotation used is the WP:short description of the linked page, so to fix one, just click on the link to go to the page, then edit the short description. If you have Galobtter's short description editing gadget it is very convenient, otherwise simply open the lead section, and edit the text in the short description template. It is usually the first or second line, but in rare cases may be elsewhere, and a search for the string {{short description| will take you directly to it. It is also possible for a short description to be generated from another template, like the place name infobox. If that throws up a bad short description, override it by manua\ly adding a short description at the top of the article source code. I will leave the example you mentioned for you to fix, as then I will know my explanation was successful, and I know it is a simple representative example, so should be straightforward. Hope this helps, Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation; I have now corrected it. I wasn't expecting the mistake to be on a redirect page - I tried Wikidata and numerous combinations looking for a template
Live and learn - thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry Arjayay, I clean forgot to mention that possibility. My bad. That would make it a lot less intuitive to find. Good work for managing anyway. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 04:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

I've made up my mind

Instead of giving presents 🎁 this year, I'm giving my opinion. Get excited!! 🎅🏻🎄🤶🎁 Atsme✍🏻📧 02:43, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

I have been doing that for years;-) Cuts down on shopping time and angst. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 04:15, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Good idea! I think I might try that. Except with my girlfriend.    — The Transhumanist   09:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 13

Newsletter • December 2018

This month: A general update.

The current status of the project is as follows:

  • Progress of the project has been generally delayed since September due to development issues (more bitrot than expected, some of the code just being genuinely confusing, etc) and personal injury (I suffered a concussion in October and was out of commission for almost two months as a result).
  • I currently expect to be putting out a proper call for CollaborationKit pilots in January/February, with estimated deployment in February/March if things don't go horribly wrong (they will, though, don't worry). As a part of that, I will properly update the page and send out announcement and reach out to all projects already signed up as pilots for WikiProject X in general, at which point those (still) interested can volunteer specifically to test the CollaborationKit extension.
    • Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots was originally created for the first WikiProject X prototype, and given this is where the project has since gone, it's only logical to continue to use it. While I haven't yet updated the page to properly reflect this:
    • If you want to add your project to this page now, feel free. Just bear in mind that more information what to actually expect will be added later/included in the announcement, because by then I will have a much better idea myself.
  • Until then, you can find me in my corner working on making the CollaborationKit code do what we want and not just what we told it, per the workboard.

Until next time,

-— Isarra ༆ 22:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Please check these flagship portals

I've upgraded the following 3 portals that are listed at the top of the Main Page:

I think they might be pushing the envelope on server time. History, especially — accessing Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/4/People seems to be taking up a lot of server time, but I don't know how to check that explicitly. Geography and Technology have been up and running for a day or so, and no reports so far.

Let me know if you get any time out errors.

Thank you.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   09:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: pinging @Dreamy Jazz, AfroThundr3007730, Waggers, Bermicourt, AmericanAir88, and Gazamp:

The Transhumanist, I have had no trouble with Portal:Geography and Portal:Technology, but Portal:History timed out first try. It will have to be trimmed some way. Fine looking portals though! Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:29, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays and thanks for your portal work!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Pbsouthwood, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Xmas

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Pbsouthwood, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pbsouthwood/Archive_13&oldid=1145716945"