User talk:Pawankshonline

Welcome!

Hello, Pawankshonline, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Xx236 (talk) 11:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

THis Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social forum. Please don't write about you WP:Autobiography.Xx236 (talk) 11:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Evansville Journal News

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the Evansville Journal News article, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. You may find our linking guidelines helpful in this regard. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 07:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Pawan sharma boda"

Pawan sharma boda, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Yintan 10:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pawankshonline

A tag has been placed on User:Pawankshonline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 14:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Madhya Pradesh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not add blogs as per WP:V. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Maharashtra, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Praxidicae (talk) 15:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Bhopal division. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ravensfire (talk) 18:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Countries in the International Organization for Standardization‎. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ravensfire (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. El_C 05:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GermanJoe (talk) 10:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Despite multiple warnings you have continued to add blogs and other unreliable link spam to Wikipedia. Please read WP:EL and WP:RS before making any further edits to Wikipedia, or the next block will likely be indefinite. GermanJoe (talk) 10:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]