User talk:Paulsullivan1999

Paulsullivan1999, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Paulsullivan1999! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cicero da Silva

Hello, Paulsullivan1999. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Cicero da Silva, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:01, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please add clear WP:INLINECITED sources to Cicero da Silva. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:27, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Youve continued to edit; could you please respond? WP:INLINECITE sources are a requirement for biographies of living people and are helpful for all articles. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:41, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cicero da Silva

The article Cicero da Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guidelines at WP:ACADEMIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 14:04, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cicero da Silva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cicero da Silva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cicero da Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ifnord (talk) 15:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article makes reference to an academic scholar that teaches in US (at the UC system in California) and it seems that he has a strong record of achievements and a reliable academic background. I woukd suggest some modifications in the article because I think it's to extensive, but I think the article shows a good example of academic profile. Yueghan (talk) 17:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Cicero da Silva. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]