User talk:Paul the dud

The article Hespeler baptist church has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 01:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing profanity

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, Wikipedia is not censored, not even to remove profanity or pornography. Please do not remove or censor information that is relevant to the article. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Icarus ^(Hi!) 03:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Miracle (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. It's an uncited and inaccurate interpretation of the situation.Thinkbui (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Plesiosaur

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Firsfron of Ronchester 20:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your edits to Wikipedia have been wholly counterproductive. If I see you doing it anymore, I'm going to indefinitely block you. Raul654 (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hespeler Baptist Church

I have nominated Hespeler Baptist Church, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hespeler Baptist Church. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 21:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hespeler Baptist Church

The place to discuss this is not the closed and moot AfD but rather deletion review. TravellingCari 23:11, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Toronto Maple Leafs, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. For rationale, see WP:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey/Player_pages_format. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 03:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Make it Seven

A tag has been placed on Make it Seven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I dream of horses (talk) 02:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Stanely cup on dock

One of wikipedia's most important policies is verifiability. While it is interesting, there are no sources to prove notability. You have to remember, there are thousands of stories out there about the Stanley Cup, so the ones included in the page should be the most notable ones (notability being indicated by reliable third party sources). -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 21:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying the cup wasn't there. I'm saying it's not notable because that actual story isn't in any reliable third party sources. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 22:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Hespeler

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Hespeler, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cambridge.ca/city_clerk/city_archives/historical_information_evolution_of_hespeler. As a copyright violation, Hespeler appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Hespeler has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Hespeler and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Hespeler with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hespeler.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Guest9999 (talk) 23:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of McUltrameat

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as McUltrameat, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indy 5

Dude! Look you retard! http://www.indianajones5.org/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.0.40.107 (talk) 23:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Official Album Art for Forget and Not Slow Down

It's official. T-Sun tweeted about it, and Absolute Punk posted it.Smile Lee (talk) 23:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terns (band)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 21:34, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rarebird Records

A tag has been placed on Rarebird Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 21:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dave Mercer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Mercer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Mercer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Saric

The article Jim Saric has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Badly sourced BLP, tagged for 9 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]