User talk:Patar knight/Archive 17
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Patar knight. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Yesterdays actions
Yeah I know right! I think we can implement these edits for the better. Fax me your proposals and I will ask Jimbo, et al. Ciao. --Joskinfieds (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Did you leave this on the wrong page? ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry! I meant this for User:Mjroots. --Joskinfieds (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- No worries. Good luck with your edits. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry! I meant this for User:Mjroots. --Joskinfieds (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 November 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone
- In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?
- Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad
- Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Peter Kent Israel/Palestine You are a HACK!!
Absolutely reprehensible that you removed the reference to my article whilst "compressing" the Wiki page. I will be ADDING my article in, daily, if required! You should be ashamed of yourself! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.194.26 (talk) 17:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The column post does not provide any information not included in the other sources. While newspaper columns are not explicitly prohibited, they should be treated with caution, especially on biographies of living people. Since the information in the column is redundant to the other provided sources, and given the obvious conflict of interest that lies with the author of the cited Times of Israel column that can be found through a cursory Google search, I have removed this source once more. If you are the author of the column, I would ask you to consider whether it is appropriate that someone with your political ties should be posting your personal columns about political matters to an open encyclopedia that strives to uphold a neutral point of view. Others have been burnt before. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 November 2015
- Arbitration report: Elections, redirections, and a resignation from the Committee
- Discussion report: Compromise of two administrator accounts prompts security review
- Featured content: Texas, film, and cycling
- In the media: Sanger on Wikipedia; Silver on Vox; lawyers on monkeys
- Traffic report: Doodles of popularity
- Gallery: Paris
The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 November 2015
- Special report: ArbCom election—candidates’ opinions analysed
- In the media: Icelandic milestone; apolitical editing
- Discussion report: BASC disbanded; other developments in the discussion world
- Arbitration report: Ban Appeals Subcommittee goes up in smoke; 21 candidates running
- Featured content: Fantasia on a Theme by Jimbo Wales
- Traffic report: Darkness and light
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Review an article?
Hey, I was wondering if you'd be willing to review the article User:Niespodj/The Other Side (2014 film). It'd been deleted at AfD back in September and the film has gotten a slight bit more coverage. Also, one of the sources that was sort of weak at AfD has become a bit stronger, the Horror Society review. Part of the reason that I'd been unable to consider it a really good RS was because they didn't really have anything about an editorial staff on their website, which they've since rectified. The only thing that might count against it is that they do sponsored posts. I'll leave that call up to you overall, though. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- However something in their favor are things like this academic text, where they're listed as a source. They give out an award that has received some coverage like this as well. I'd say that they're likely usable as long as something isn't a sponsored article and they mark these posts as sponsored. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- It definitely looks better than before, and I wouldn't oppose you if you returned it to mainspace, though I still think it's borderline at best and might not survive another AfD. While doing research for this as part of the review, I found an interview with the director on examiner.com that could be of use. I can't link it, because examiner.com is blacklisted, but the name of the article is "The Other Side: Interview with independent filmmaker Chris Niespodzianski". If you want to use it, you would have to whitelist it and use the source cautiously. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
'Withdrawn by nominator' is a speedy close criterion if other editors have not argued for deletion. In this case an outcome based on consensus or a no consensus close is needed. --Michig (talk) 09:54, 28 November 2015 (UTC) ...and how did you arrive at 'keep' when it has been relisted twice because there wasn't a consensus? --Michig (talk) 10:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- You're right, I was up very late trying to clear Category:AfD debates relisted 3 or more times, and although I read the discussion and wanted to use a close criterion that would both have the same effect as if I had closed it while not prejudicing a renomination, which in hindsight, I should not have done. However, just because one closing administrator finds there is no consensus and/or wants to relist it for further discussion does not mean another closing administrator is forced to close it as "no consensus" after no further replies have been made. In this case, the changes made to the article by 10 November persuaded a third editor to argue in favour of keeping the article and for the nominator to withdraw the nomination. I think this is a fair reading of the consensus, but you can take it to DRV or a renomination if you want. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 November 2015
- News and notes: Fundraising update; FDC recommendations
- Featured content: Caves and stuff
- Traffic report: J'en ai ras le bol
- Arbitration report: Third Palestine-Israel case closes; Voting begins
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
removal of my web page
Dear Sir / madame Patar Knight
I woke up today to find my user page was deleted and it said you deleted it. Can you please explain why it was deleted. I am a real person. I did not advertise anything. I posted my biography. If you would be so kind as to let me know why you thought deleting my biography / user page was neccessary. Thank you for your time and considerations,
BUDDY PLANT AKA Raymond St.Claire
- Hi, please refer to the following elements of our criteria for speedy deletion U5, which states that "Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages, with the exception of plausible drafts and pages adhering to Wikipedia:User pages#What may I have in my user pages?." ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:11, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Oct 2015 Milhist backlog drive
Military history service award | ||
I hereby award you this as a token of the project’s appreciation for your contributions during the October 2015 Military history project backlog drive. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC) |
Vesuvius Records UK
Hi, I would like to contest your deletion of Vesuvius Records UK - could you please put it up for a proper deletion review. 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Since it was deleted via WP:PROD, I've restored, it, but put it to AfD (discussion) because of the notability concerns. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 December 2015
- Op-ed: Whither Wikidata?
- Traffic report: Jonesing for episodes
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 December 2015
- News and notes: ArbCom election results announced
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 winners
- Traffic report: So do you laugh, or does it cry?
- Featured content: Sports, ships, arts... and some other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Second attempt to create SpectroCoin article
Hey,
I have tried before to create SpectroCoin article, but it was deleted as advertisement of the company. I re-wrote the text and provided references. Could you double check if this time it doesn't look as promotion or advertisement. Thank you in advance for your help.
- Hi, this version is certainly better than the previous one, which had no references. However, this text is still problematic as almost all of the references provided would not be considered reliable sources. For example, citing a company's website for statements about that company are generally frowned upon. Similarly, Bitcoinwales looks like a blog written by Bitcoin enthusiasts and thus wouldn't be acceptable. Some of the other sources do have editorial boards, but makes it unclear what the writers'/editors' qualifications are so are potentially problematic. I also see that all of your sources are from industry sources, which would seem to indicate that SpectroCoin doesn't attract enough non-industry coverage to meet the Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and would make it harder to survive an articles for deletion discussion.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Collapsed article text
|
---|
SpectroCoin article text provided below: SpectroCoin is an online application which provides bitcoin exchange and wallet services. SpectroCoin company mainly focuses on the bitcoin storage at web and mobile wallets services and allows users to buy, sell, send or receive bitcoin crypto-currency. [1] SpectroCoin company is founded in February 2013 by Vytautas Karalevičius, Mantas Mockevičius, Justas Dobiliauskas and managed by Lithuanian-UK company Spectro Finance Ltd. [2] SpectroCoin Bitcoin exchange and wallet services are available in over 150 countries worldwide and company operates over 20 methods of depositing and withdrawing funds, such as through other electronic wallets or bank or credit cards transactions. [3] [4] Company also introduced bitcoin prepaid debit card which can be used at ATMs or physical shops. [5] [6] ProductsSpectroCoin company provides 4 core products including currency exchange, e-wallet, payment integration tools for merchants and physical debit card which available in Europe and other countries. [7] ExchangeAccording to the CEO of the company Vytautas Karalevicius, crypto-currency usage allows SpectroCoin to act as a liquidity provider, consequently users are able to buy and sell bitcoins immediately. [8] SpectroCoin exchange allows trade between bitcoin and fiat currency Euro. [9] According to CEO Vytautas Karalevicius, the key SpectroCoin future plan is to introduce additional fiat and digital currencies both fiat and digital [10] Company also offers bitcoin conversion services to cash in 25 countries. [11] WalletSpectroCoin mobile Bitcoin wallet provides secure bitcoin storage. This wallet supports iOS, Android and Windows mobile phones. [12] SpectroCoin wallet provides easy to use and fast way of sending and receiving bitcoins. [13] Besides, SpectroCoin wallet gives its users the possibility to pay for goods and services, at the places where Bitcoin is accepted. Including a number of shops, cafes and restaurants in London, Southern Europe and the Baltic States. [14] Debit CardSpectroCoin Bitcoin prepaid Debit card works in the same way as any other ordinary payment card. SpectroCoin debit card is funded instantly through SpectroCoin users’ online wallet. This debit card can be used for money withdrawals from any ATMs across 150 countries globally, where ordinary credit or debit cards are accepted. Bitcoin payments made with SpectroCoin debit card are approved at over 20 million merchants worldwide, mainly where MasterCard or VISA payments are accepted. [17]
Merchant SolutionSpectroCoin is the first company in Europe which offers merchant tools of Bitcoin payments integration to both online and physical businesses. According to company’s CEO Vytautas Karalevicius, this merchant solution connects customers who use bitcoin crypto-currency for making purchase and merchants, which are willing to accept such as payments. [18] Firstly, SpectroCoin merchant solution tool provides allows bitcoin payment system integration for online businesses by using API or e-commerce plug-ins. These plug-ins and API support OpenChart, Drupal, WHMCS and Magento e-commerce platforms. [19] Secondly, SpectroCoin provides merchant tool integration for physical businesses. As SpectroCoin offers its own solution for bitcoin payments integrated into existing Point of Sale system. [20] HistorySpectroCoin company was established and registered in United Kingdom in February 2013. Alpha version of SpectroCoin app, which functioned as decentralized currency exchange was launched in July 2013. [21] In February 2014, SpectroCoin introduced wallet services and merchant solution tools. In May 2015, SpectroCoin proposed plastic Bitcoin Debit Card. [22] References
|
Bill Morneau vs. Privy Council
I don't know if you've ever seen it or not, but if you haven't, check out the sheer size of the hidden comment that had to be left in Belinda Stronach, right in the introduction between her name and the PC designation, years ago when people doing the same thing in her article actually turned into a full-on constant unresolvable edit war. Bearcat (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- That's hilarious. Hopefully it doesn't happen with all these new Liberal ministers that we have to use something that huge though. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 December 2015
- In the media: Wales in China; #Edit2015
- Arbitration report: GMO case decided
- Featured content: An unusually slow week
- WikiProject report: Women in Red—using teamwork and partnerships to elevate online and offline collaborations
- Traffic report: A feast of Spam
The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 December 2015
- News and notes: WMF Board dismisses community-elected trustee
- Arbitration report: Second Arbitration Enforcement case concludes as another case is suspended
- Featured content: The post-Christmas edition
- Traffic report: The Force we expected
- Year in review: The top ten Wikipedia stories of 2015
- In the media: Wikipedia plagued by a "Basket of Deception"
- Gallery: It's that time of year again
Louder Than Life
Hi, I would like to create a page for Louder Than Life. I saw you deleted one that someone previously made. Is it ok if I make another one more professionally and with valid information with references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1515398nick (talk • contribs) 17:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply, missed this over holidays. Although I don't think I deleted the page (if Louder Than Life is the page you're referring to), any contributions that make use of reliable, independent, third party sources would be welcome and would increase the chance that it will be deemed notable enough to be kept on the wiki. If you want to retrieve the previous material, you can make a request in the Requests for Undeletion Process. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Peter MacKay
Sorry, but when I first seen this edit,[1] I thought it was just another one of the unsourced nonsense edits that appear in the article from time-to-time. I didn't actually expect it to be true. Had the source been provided by the editor who added it, I never would have reverted. However, I have read through the source a couple of times now and see where it states "neighbour's dog" but can't find where it says "in a ploy to appear more likeable." It was actually that statement that originally made me think it was nonsense. Comparing what was added and what the source says, does that sound to you like the editor was just drawing his or her own conclusion? I may just be misunderstanding the way it was written, but that's the feeling I get after reading the source. Cmr08 (talk) 11:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- No worries, you were definitely right to revert edits to a BLP that are unsourced and at first glance appear to be absurd. To me "In a ploy to appear more likeable" seems implied by Coyne but is probably too much OR for Wikipedia and I guess I should've removed it when I added a source. I've made the change so take a look. Happy new year! ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me, I think the changes you made are probably the way to go here. Happy New Year to you also. Cmr08 (talk) 01:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 January 2016
- News and notes: The WMF's age of discontent
- In the media: Impenetrable science; Jimmy Wales back in the UAE
- Arbitration report: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case been decided
- Featured content: Featured menagerie
- WikiProject report: Try-ing to become informed - WikiProject Rugby League
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 13 January 2016
- Community view: Battle for the soul of the WMF
- Editorial: We need a culture of verification
- In focus: The Crisis at New Montgomery Street
- Op-ed: Transparency
- Traffic report: Pattern recognition: Third annual Traffic Report
- Special report: Wikipedia community celebrates Public Domain Day 2016
- News and notes: Community objections to new Board trustee
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Interview: outgoing and incumbent arbitrators 2016
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 20 January 2016
- News and notes: Vote of no confidence; WMF trustee speaks out
- In the media: 15th anniversary news round-up
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: This week's featured content
The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2016
- News and notes: Geshuri steps down from the Board
- In the media: Media coverage of the Arnnon Geshuri no-confidence vote
- Recent research: Bursty edits; how politics beat religion but then lost to sports; notability as a glass ceiling
- Traffic report: Death and taxes
- Featured content: This week's featured content
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Scott (ice hockey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TSN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 February 2016
- From the editors: Help wanted
- Special report: Board chair and new trustee speak with the Signpost
- Arbitration report: Catching up on arbitration
- Traffic report: Bowled
- Featured content: This week's featured content
The Signpost: 10 February 2016
- News and notes: Another WMF departure
- In the media: Jeb Bush swings at Wikipedia and connects
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: A river of revilement
The Signpost: 17 February 2016
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Super Bowling
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 24 February 2016
- Special report: WMF in limbo as decision on Tretikov nears
- Op-ed: Backward the Foundation
- Traffic report: Of Dead Pools and Dead Judges
- Arbitration report: Arbitration motion regarding CheckUser & Oversight inactivity
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 March 2016
- News and notes: Tretikov resigns, WMF in transition
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Brawling
The Signpost: 09 March 2016
- News and notes: Katherine Maher named interim head of WMF; Wales email re-sparks Heilman controversy; draft WMF strategy posted
- Technology report: Wikimedia wikis will temporarily go into read-only mode on several occasions in the coming weeks
- WikiCup report: First round of the WikiCup finishes
- Traffic report: All business like show business
The Signpost: 16 March 2016
- News and notes: Wikipedia Zero: Orange mobile partnership in Africa ends; the evolution of privacy loss in Wikipedia
- In the media: Wales at SXSW; lawsuit over Wikipedia PR editing
- Discussion report: Is an interim WMF executive director inherently notable?
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Technology report: Watchlists, watchlists, watchlists!
- Traffic report: Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #119: The Foundation and the departure of Lila Tretikov
The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 March 2016
- News and notes: Lila Tretikov a Young Global Leader; Wikipediocracy blog post sparks indefinite blocks
- In the media: Angolan file sharers cause trouble for Wikipedia Zero; the 3D printer edit war; a culture based on change and turmoil
- Traffic report: Be weary on the Ides of March
- Editorial: "God damn it, you've got to be kind."
- Featured content: Watch out! A slave trader, a live mascot and a crested serpent awaits!
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel article 3 case amended
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #120: Status of Wikimania 2016
The Signpost: 1 April 2016
- News and notes: Trump/Wales 2016
- WikiProject report: Why should the Devil have all the good music? An interview with WikiProject Christian music
- Traffic report: Donald v Daredevil
- Featured content: A slow, slow week
- Technology report: Browse Wikipedia in safety? Use Telnet!
- Recent research: "Employing Wikipedia for good not evil" in education; using eyetracking to find out how readers read articles
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #121: How April Fools went down
Get schwifty listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Get schwifty. Since you had some involvement with the Get schwifty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Davey2010Talk 23:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 April 2016
- News and notes: Denny Vrandečić resigns from Wikimedia Foundation board
- In the media: Wikimedia Sweden loses copyright case; Tex Watson; AI assistants; David Jolly biography
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: A welcome return to pop culture and death
- Arbitration report: The first case of 2016—Wikicology
- Gallery: A history lesson
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack MacLaren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 April 2016
- Special report: Update on EranBot, our new copyright violation detection bot
- Traffic report: Two for the price of one
- Featured content: The double-sized edition
- Arbitration report: Amendments made to the Race and intelligence case
MSN Murthy
Hi Patar Knight,
Mr MSN Murthy whose page you deleted is a well known Indian classical musician. The page wasfor information and not advertisement. I totally understand and appreciate your interest in keeping the wiki clean.
URL: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MSN_Murthy
Please let me know how it can be reinstated.
Best regards Raghu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.128.78.166 (talk) 16:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Raghu. The original page was being written in a blatantly non-neutral, advertising tone. You're welcome to start a new article, as long as it meets our general notability guideline. Our related guidelines for musicians and our neutral point of view pages should be helpful if you do this. If you send me an email with the email function on the sidebar, I can send you the deleted content of the article. Hope this helps, ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:46, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Patar knight. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |