User talk:Patagonia23

Welcome!

Hello, Patagonia23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to the article William Cleveland (author) does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Again, welcome! • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William Cleveland (author, community-arts leader)

The William Cleveland (author, community-arts leader) page that you created has been redirected to William Cleveland (author), which you also created. There is no need to create two articles for the same subject. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: William Cleveland (author)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as William Cleveland (author), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.ci.pasadena.ca.us/arts/Summitt2008/BCBIO.pdf, http://www.ccm.uc.edu/arts_admin/faculty.asp OR another promotional copy of his biography, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:William Cleveland (author) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:William Cleveland (author) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:William Cleveland (author).

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:William Cleveland (author)/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:William Cleveland (author) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced query

I have removed your query from Template talk:Talkback, as that is not the place for that sort of question. As it appears from the above and from your other contribs that you have already found the answer, I will leave it at that. Anomie ⚔ 23:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

Thank you for your note. You have a reply. If by chance you don't return in the next six days, it will likely be automatically archived here. In that case, while you can read my response there, please leave any new questions or comments at my front talk page, as I will likely not see any notes left in archive. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Art and Upheaval for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Art and Upheaval is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art and Upheaval until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]