User talk:ParthaSarathiMishra

Nomination of Transparent Media Portal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transparent Media Portal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparent Media Portal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 20:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ParthaSarathiMishra. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Transparent Media Portal for deletion, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Noting this Quora answer and this Youtube video. ∯WBG^converse 13:29, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Winged Blades of Godric

On the talk page of the article and on the deletion page, I have clearly said that neither I nor the sources mentioned by me in the article are part of any organisation who proposed the draft. So, there is no Conflict of Interest, no advocacy and I have not violated in any way the policies of Wikipedia. Even if law passes, I or the sources I have quoted do not get political gains since only author of law gets any name or credit. For example, take Frank-Dodd Act, there is no credit for those thousands who must have campaigned for it.

ParthaSarathiMishra (talk) 11:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You and your fellow mates have been already warned to not use Wikipedia as a promotional vehicle for your political platform. ∯WBG^converse 13:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Winged Blades of Godric

I do want to understand fully and follow the policies of Wikipedia. I have gone through the policies of Wikipedia and found that I did not violate any Wikipedia policies.

I requested the editors several times to quote portions of the Wikipedia links they give and use those portions to establish how they got to the conclusion they got to I would request you to do the same. Thanks.

ParthaSarathiMishra (talk) 11:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mithula UK for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mithula UK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithula UK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 14:11, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]