User talk:Paris91

Category:Schoolteachers by school has been nominated for discussion

Category:Schoolteachers by school, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Triptothecottage (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paris91, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Paris91! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Temple Neuf, Metz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Temple Neuf, Metz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Preview – Consolidate – Summarize

Hello, and thanks for your efforts on Wikipedia. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
- The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 13:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reims, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yèvre (Marne), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Champagne paragraphs" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Champagne paragraphs. Since you had some involvement with the Champagne paragraphs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Legend of Love (ballet) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Legend of Love (ballet), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 11:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oil of Saints

Dear User:Paris91, I noticed that you removed a large amount of information from the Oil of Saints article to create a content fork called List of myroblyte saints. The creation of a new article about the same topic is not recommended under Wikipedia policy and as a result, I have redirect the new wikilink back to the original article. Please feel free to expand the original Oil of Saints article, which is the common name of the topic. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 07:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parlement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parliament of Flanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Sovereign Court of Lorraine and Barrois" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sovereign Court of Lorraine and Barrois. Since you had some involvement with the Sovereign Court of Lorraine and Barrois redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Legend of Love (ballet) (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hasteur was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Legend of Love (ballet) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Legend of Love (ballet), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 02:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for creating Comœdia (paper)! Happy editing. Mccapra (talk) 19:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Legend of Love (ballet)

Hello, Paris91. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Legend of Love".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 05:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sinaia (disambiguation)

The article Sinaia (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambig page per WP:ONEOTHER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]