User talk:Paraloco

Spic

Your addition to Spic sounds correct, but as it is uncited, it may be removed. Would you please cite a source for that information? Please see reliable sources and citing sources. If you would like me to convert your source to an article cite, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks for your contribution. Jim1138 (talk) 00:18, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chink. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits need to be verifiable to avoid original research. —Bagumba (talk) 04:57, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please refrain from simply blanking sections of an article. If a statement is unsourced, tag it with the relevant template. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 13:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article agree with their perspective. People with a close connection to a subject are not prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information.

Finally, it is important not to add content that is solely based on your own observations and understanding of the world, what we call original research. While it's important to use your good judgment when editing, it's critical to base everything on what is published in reliable sources and to cover all perspectives in a balanced manner reflecting the weight accorded them by sources, even when they dispute your own beliefs and knowledge. Thank you. Joja lozzo 23:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Chinese Exclusion, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Yintan² 22:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chinese Exclusion Act with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Your addition to the Spic article is incorrect as your "reference" (unban dictionary) defines spic as follows:

A highly offensive term referring to a Spanish-speaking person from Mexico, Central or South America, Spain, or Portugal.

Please check your "references" before removing my edits. Denisarona (talk) 12:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Sale flamand, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]