User talk:ParaCheetha
ParaCheetha, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi ParaCheetha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 11 May 2019 (UTC) |
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cdo2017, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Para Leg
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Para Leg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chittagong Hill Tracts conflict without explaining why. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. It is always helpful to others if you describe your changes with an accurate edit summary. If the changes are small, an edit summary may be sufficient. For large removals of sourced content, such as this one, explain your reasoning on the article's talk page and seek consensus before making the change, especially if the change has already been reverted once. For further explanation see the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)