User talk:Pappuraw

March 2018

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lorraine Hansberry have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rakesh Roshan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. deadwikipedian (talk) 06:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kuber Chadda

Hello Pappuraw,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kuber Chadda for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Anaxial (talk) 07:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Kuber Chadda, you may be blocked from editing. deadwikipedian (talk) 07:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Popularity of subejcts

Hi Pappuraw, Thank you for creating this article and your addition about the popularity of subjects at HUS. As this is quite a subjective topic, any claim about which subjects are popular or about the quality of the school must be verified by independent sources. Unfortunately the entire section is unsourced. I have therefore removed it until reliable third party sources can be found that substantiate those claims. If you have any questions, please let me know. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 10:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pappuraw, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pappuraw! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm Jake Brockman. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Hiranandani Upscale School, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Given the controversial nature of the incident, adding names of people involved does not support the encyclopaedic character of Wikipedia and may be regarded as a violation about biographies of living people. Also, you have not provided any independent sources about the change of leadership. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]