User talk:Papazupazuzu

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Antovigo! Thank you for your contributions. I am MjolnirPants and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! $ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.$ 16:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teacher bias in grading (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Discrimination in education. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teacher bias in grading and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Teacher bias in grading, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:55, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antovigo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:55, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Teacher bias in grading concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Teacher bias in grading, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Teacher bias in grading

Hello, Antovigo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Teacher bias in grading".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting my mistake!

Hi, thanks for undoing what I did! I have no clue how that happened. I really think I didn't realise what I was doing, maybe I hit the button when I was falling asleep (I didn't see it happening, must be my meds). Thank you so much, I didn't even notice what I did. I'm sorry for the mess. I just fixed the quotes now, though. I don't think I made any new crazy mistakes. I must never edit the Wikipedia when I'm too tired. Pwoli (talk) 11:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MEDRS

WP:MEDRS has instructions how to cite medical sources. I added a tag to your edit indicating that. Best regards, Jamplevia (talk) 13:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

taking a liberty

In this edit, I have taken the liberty of putting in some line-feeds, to distinguish paragraphs, and removing one. I guessed, perhaps mistakenly, that you intended paragraphing so. If you don't like what I have done, please undo it.Chjoaygame (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having clarified things for myself, I have now undone the liberty I took. I hope I haven't inconvenienced you.Chjoaygame (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert - gender

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk) 01:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]