Jump to content

User talk:Jamplevia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello

WP:MEDRS

[edit]

Has instructions on what kind of sourcing we are looking for. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jamplevia (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bookmarks

[edit]

Larry Kucharz

[edit]

Born September 22, 1946. Latest album (CD) released 2014. Record label website went off the air in 2021.

Interviews

NYT

Finding aids

Reviews

Performance

Radio

Business websites

Books

Isla Maria ‘Loulou’ Van Damme

[edit]

Interviews

Photo Shoots

maintenance messages docs

[edit]

Category:CS1_maint:_url-status

A cautionary tale

[edit]

Areas of interest

[edit]

History of the Chicken Tractor

[edit]

There is already this article: Chicken tractor but it lacks any historical background. (talk) 12:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POV: I first became aware of chicken tractors via online sources circa 2006. I witnessed my first operational deployment of chick tractors in 2020. Now I see Stock Cropper developing their ClusterCluck product line in 2022.

Clues

[edit]

In order to know where to do research I need to find clues first.

  • Chicken tractor cites Andrew W. Lee's book as being from 2006 but Google books shows it was originally published in 1994. Worldcat has OCLC 777312292 ISBN 9780962464829 ISBN 9780962464867 ISBN 0962464821 ISBN 0962464864. 1994 might be the year that chicken tractors originated, or at least the oldest year of publication.
  • Endland in the late 1800s using wattle hurdles to move chickens around or weaving basket runs. the more wealthy people used wire fencing
  • Henry Stephens Book of the Farm

The Book of the Farm, Volume 1, Henry Stephens Originally published: 1842, 1889 edition

Doesn't mention chicken. Search for

  • poultry
  • fowl
  • fowls
  • broods
  • brooders
  • eggs

instead.

Doesn't mention wattle but it does include hurdle for enclosing sheep on turnips. N.b. it's very encouraging to me to see such a design, there may be chicken tractors here.

The Book of the Farm, Volume 2, Henry Stephens Originally published: 1842, 1847 edition

How medical research makes it into medical practice?

[edit]

POV: I've observed that some ideas that are supported by large amounts of medical research for hundreds of years appear to have very limited influence on medical practice. This includes a research paper directly requesting (petitioning?) that a medical textbook be updated with information based on the medical research.

How does medical research makes it into medical practice? Is there a formal process? (talk) 12:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology and phrasing

[edit]
  • Translating Medical Research Into Medical Practice
  • Translational Biomedical Sciences

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you so much for this link i love u

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moby_Project&diff=prev&oldid=1087041777 Oriolgalceran (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. I'm glad to have helped you by providing you with a link to a working download site for the Moby project. Jamplevia (talk) 17:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Blue Edits. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Talk:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Blue Edits (talk) 07:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about myself. ... Jamplevia (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why is my disease obscene? Jamplevia (talk) 00:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User talk:Woodensuperman, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. --woodensuperman 16:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that my disability is causing issues, but I do have a real question: why is popular culture considered to be trivia. ---- Jamplevia (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • re Cocteau, the best guidance for popular culture is not whether the subject of the article is important to the popular culture referenced, but whether that culture is important to the subject of the article. So does the film have any significance to Cocteau? Or to our contemporary perception of Cocteau?
For this instance, I'm not seeing it. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! Now I get it. Thanks! ---- Jamplevia (talk) 11:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley is it true the other way around? If modern culture references the old culture is it ok to mention it in an article. I put a reference to Cocteau in Liquid Sky. ---- Jamplevia (talk) 11:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's already mentioned at Liquid Sky, but it still seems trivial, and the plot summary seems a bit long. --woodensuperman 11:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know the film, but the mention there seems about right. I don't think the plot summary is problematically long, although it's certainly long and longer than we would usually favour.
I wouldn't add Cocteau in an IPC section. This is just (yet another) early '80s passing reference to Cocteau in a film (and it's mentioned). Those years were full of them, Cocteau was fashionable, despite few people actually reading him or watching his films. IPC is more for when a more knowing, yet less obvious, reference is made. So as the apparent inverse of what I wrote, The Seventh Seal has an IPC section which mentions Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey. Bill & Ted mentions The Seventh Seal directly (not IPC), as a major plot device that they borrow. Seal places the reciprocal mention in an IPC section. Although Bill & Ted (whilst most excellent) obviously had no influence on a film 30 years earlier, it does demonstrate (as is our core need) that the older film is still important and relevant to popular culture much later on, and that these later references are influencing the modern perception of the original film. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't believe how much you are helping me learn the rules! You help is so very invaluable to me. Jamplevia (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Institute for Uranian Psychoanalysis

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jamplevia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Institute for Uranian Psychoanalysis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamplevia&oldid=1240956747"