User talk:PantherLoop

Welcome!

Hello, PantherLoop, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kim Hnizdo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RA0808 ^talk _contribs 16:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Hnizdo

The article Kim Hnizdo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 16:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited America's Next Top Model (cycle 8), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shannon Stewart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Linguist111. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Top Model (Scandinavia cycle 1), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 12:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Linguist111. An edit that you recently made to Austria's Next Topmodel (cycle 5) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Linguist If you reply here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to your message 14:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Top Model does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Judging by your contributions, you have not yet used one. Please start. Thank you. Linguist If you reply here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to your message 21:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Linguist If you reply here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to your message 20:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Top Model (Scandinavia cycle 4), you may be blocked from editing. Linguist If you reply here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to your message 18:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Top Model. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. I have found no reliable sources that say Supermodel po-ukrainsky is a licensed Top Model adaptation Linguist If you reply here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to your message 10:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PantherLoop. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Top Model

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Top Model. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to the Top Model franchise. Thanks and best regards!

Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 22:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hi PantherLoop, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hi, please don't remove links to articles on other wikis. Thank you. Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 11:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebecca Mir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Mir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Mir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 04:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at America's Next Top Model (cycle 23). Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 17:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is PantherLoop adding original research to articles. Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 15:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Linguist111. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to America's Next Top Model (cycle 23) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Linguist ^talk|contribs 20:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya again. I just wanted to point out something about the sandbox as I think I now know what Linguist was talking about in regards to it. This edit where you added a ninth column to the table before the ninth episode came out, I think Linguist was pointing you to the sandbox for working on the table. It might be useful to use your sandbox for those kinds of edits so that the table is ready to be moved over once the new episode is out. The reason for this is simple, it keeps the article looking nice and neat, but, also keeps updates ready for when the time comes. I do this when working on infoboxes; draw it up in my sandbox and then put the updates into the article. I do this because I always make an error somewhere that breaks the infobox. I don't watch the "next top model" shows, but, I presume new episodes come out each week? in which case you could have a copy of the table in your sandbox and update it each week to place into the article. That said, it looks like this sort of one empty column in the table is a not uncommon practice for the article. Not everyone is great at working around wikimarkup, so I'm guessing that's done to assist newbie editors in contributing without having to work on the table itself. Hope that helps. Cheers, Mr rnddude (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited America's Next Top Model (cycle 23), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Graham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Germany's Next Topmodel (cycle 12), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaun Ross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Céline Bethmann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Céline Bethmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Céline Bethmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Colombia's Next Top Model (cycle 3)

Hi, I'm Winged Blades of Godric. PantherLoop, thanks for creating Colombia's Next Top Model (cycle 3)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Too detailed and non-focused to be encyclopaedic.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Winged Blades^Godric 11:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caribbean's Next Top Model (cycle 3)

The article Caribbean's Next Top Model (cycle 3) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.Too detailed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades^Godric 13:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:PantherLoop. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Linguist ^talk|contribs 20:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a free webhosting service. Wikipedia is not a place to post personal content, host personal websites, or do things that are not directly related to adding to or improving the encyclopedia, as you did at User:PantherLoop. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Linguist ^talk|contribs 07:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. The thread is Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host by PantherLoop. Linguist ^talk|contribs 14:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

PantherLoop, is the material on your page intended to be used for a Wikipedia article? If so, either use it or leave the page blank, as it is at this moment. You're mistaken in thinking the page is 'yours to do what you want with'; please see WP:USER for the purpose of userpages. Bishonen | talk 20:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:PantherLoop

A tag has been placed on User:PantherLoop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Linguist ^talk|contribs 11:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

I'm sorry to see you have ignored my polite warning and question above, and have simply re-inserted the material. I have now deleted the page; please don't recreate it. Bishonen | talk 12:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Last warning

Pantherloop, looking at this, I'm not sure Wikipedia is the right place for you. If you call people names again you will be blocked indefinitely. Bishonen | talk 08:48, 17 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: You can have some personal information on your page, but not your age; it has been removed. This is done to protect you. Please see Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Bishonen | talk 10:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Your contributions to Wikipedia

Hello PantherLoop,

I'd like to say that I'm sorry if I've been too harsh on you. I promise that, in the future, if I disagree with one of your edits, I will leave you a handwritten message instead of the template messages I have been leaving you. If you would like me to refrain from leaving you messages, please let me know and I will do so. I would like to say that I appreciate your contributions to the Top Model articles. While I may not agree with every edit you've ever made, I'm assuming that you have been editing in good faith. I'd like to give you a little bit of advice on some basic rules you may not have understood:

Biographies of living persons - you should, as much as you can, support all statements about living people with inline citations to reliable sources, and remove anything that you cannot verify with a source.

Edit summaries - it is not compulsory to use edit summaries, but it is good practice to do so, as it helps other users to understand the intention of your edits when they view a page's history.

What Wikipedia is and is not. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a battleground. Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service or social networking service.

If you are finding the language barrier difficult, you might prefer to contribute to the German Wikipedia instead. You are welcome to continue to contribute to the English Wikipedia, but it is important to understand what editing Wikipedia entails. If you fail to do so, you may be blocked from editing. This is not done to punish you, but rather to prevent problems. Please note that I am not an administrator, and therefore I cannot block you myself. Bishonen, however, is. I hope you decide to follow this advice and continue to contribute to Wikipedia.

Regards, Linguist¹ 1 ¹ 17:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kim Hnizdo) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kim Hnizdo, PantherLoop!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Passes NPP. Noting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Céline Bethmann, she might have enough significant post-GNT coverage to avoid redirect and capsule coverage at Germany's_Next_Topmodel_(cycle_11).

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 05:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Olivia Wardell

The article Olivia Wardell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent reliable published sources for this living person. No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 15:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed BLP deletion of Olivia Wardell

The article Olivia Wardell has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RexxS (talk) 16:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olivia Wardell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olivia Wardell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Wardell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RexxS (talk) 09:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Top Model po-ukrainsky (cycle 4)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. PantherLoop, thanks for creating Top Model po-ukrainsky (cycle 4)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. At the moment, this has no sources and no indication of why it is notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of India Gants

The article India Gants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PantherLoop. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of India Gants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India Gants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Gants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ApprenticeFan work 12:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PantherLoop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]