User talk:Panel1

Re: Famous Kapus

I have tagged the lists with POV and cleanup/verify/context tags where needed. As for restoring Famous Kapus, again, I'm not an administrator, so I can't do it. --Core des at talk! 04:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's better of to place list it in Wikipedia:Deletion review as it was deleted validly per AFD. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 16:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reg Kapu article changes

Dear Panel1, I appreciate your hardwork and sincerity in writing and safe guarding the kapu article in wikipedia.I have made some minor changes to the Kapu article to highlight the present political awakening that has taken place to get their share of power and economic status.I also added some basic facts like govt ignorement towards kapus and lack of major politcal representation in both the major parties.I have added by commnets in the discussion section too.Please have a look at the article. Also we need to see whether we can add some of the sections added by Andhra and Telugu bidda which you have deleted.I think showcasinf Kapu caste as the mother of caste is NOT wrong..its been proved by social scientists too.

Thanks, John Rambo 04:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your inputs

Dear Panel1 garu, Your chnages are good and make sense.I really appreciate them.The main reason I have added the Old and present suitaation of kapus is to make them realise what they have lost over the years.Many of kapus are NOT inclined to take politics or businesss b'cas of which the whole community is going backwards.There is a need for this new generation of kapus to know their history and also on what they have lost and also how they can fight for thier rightfull share in nation building. Off course the Kapu article has to be historical but i firmly beleive that they is a need to show kapus where they are now and what they are lacking and what needs to done...Its always easy to showcase the strenghts BUT it takes gr8 courage to analyse the weaknesses and accept them and gr8 effort to elimintate them...I would make sure that those are put in a subtle and proper way so that persons who read this article are NOT offended thats was the main reason why I had added the gr8 contributions of kapus over the centuries.. I also like to inform you that I have been an active contributor and safe keeper of this article for the last 2-3 yrs since the first basic article was written.I would try to maintain the same role and responsibility.

Thanks, John Rambo 00:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your comments on various social groups. Basically all Telugu agrarian groups originated from a common stock. They got divided on the basis of geographical, social, economic, religious and political reasons. Reddy was not a caste till recently (40 years). They are categorized as Kapus even today in many regions. Reddy is a title used by Kapu, Velama, Kamma, Yadava, Boya etc., Distinct features and traits are seen in early separated Kamma and Velama groups. Modern molecular techniques can reveal similarities and divergence. Self glorification ignoring history is unscientific.Kumarrao (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A few copyediting points

Greetings, your enthusiasm is impressive, but some of the work you're doing will have to be cleaned up by other editors due to variance from Wikipedia standards. You could help us by keeping in mind that the following things generally aren't used in Wikipedia.

Bolding various words simply because they're important: "This occurred in the Medieval Period and...". Either put a wikilink on the word, or just leave it plain. Bolding is mainly just used for the first time the title word is used in the article, not just for emphasis.
"&" is not used in normal text; please type "and"
"Note:" is not generally used, same thing with "It is important to note that", "surprisingly", etc. If you're writing it down, there's an assumption that it's worth noting, otherwise we wouldn't include it.
"See [[Article X]]" is used sometimes, sparingly, but nowhere near as heavy as you're using it. It's not mean to be used every few sentences. One good way to replace this is at the start of a section with the {{see| }} and {{main| }} tags.

Just a few pointers on keeping editing as smooth as possible. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vijayakanth

Actor and DMDK President Vijayakanth is a Kammavar from Madurai —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.202.129.39 (talk) 01:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Munnuru Kapu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Munnuru Kapu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mdann52 (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kapu (caste), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Naik and Mithila. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kapu (caste), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Please read WP:RS. Blogspot sources, especially where associated with specific castes, are not reliable. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Bishonen | talk 11:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Panel1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]