User talk:Paleontologist99

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Paleontologist99. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. My name is Howicus, and I've been an editor here for some time. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

If you're working on creating a new article, you should take a look at this page on your first article, and use the article wizard here to get started. Also, this page has instructions on how to cite sources, complete with videos.

If all this Wikicode is a little overwhelming, this cheatsheet may help untangle it.

If you're looking for a tutorial of sorts, The Wikipedia Adventure is a good option.

And if you need more help, I'd recommend getting live help at the Wikipedia help chat channel: click here to join. Additionally, you could ask me on my talk page, try the Teahouse (a help page for new users) or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome, and have fun editing! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Iphone-os-3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Iphone-os-3.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paleontologist99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You don't have to accept. But I just want to tell you that I am sorry! I am sorry for the vandalism. I am sorry for disrespecting you. And, I am VERY sorry for sock puppeting. I will NEVER EVER DO THOSE THREE THINGS EVER AGAIN!!!!!! Do you forgive me? I am messed up! I feel regretful for my actions.

Decline reason:

Unblocking you provides no benefit to Wikipedia whatsoever. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paleontologist99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla, you may not realize it but, I am actually NOT 69.70.116.250 or 207.35.196.243. Also, as I said earlier, my IP addresses start with 2602 NOT 2002. You have been falsely accusing me of evading the block since November of 2015! Though, I forgive you. This issue is over 1 YEAR OLD!!!!!!!!! I am VERY sorry for the vandalism I have done a year ago. To tell the truth, I actually OPPOSE vandalism. Also, I have good grammar compared to Ipadguy. That can tell you that the IP address you accused and Ipadguy are actually SOMEONE ELSE!!!!!!!!! I am just trying to let you know. This is NOT a lie at all. This is the HONEST TRUTH. Also, for real this time, PLEASE run a checkuser. Thank you for reading. Paleontologist99 (talk) 03:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You actually oppose vandalism and still did it? Sorry, that doesn't make any sense. It's also a rather curious coincidence that you became aware of who is accused of being your sock quite that quickly. IP addresses may change; CheckUser is never used on request to prove innocence. Huon (talk) 19:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Paleontologist99! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:34, Monday, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Paleontologist99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17140 was submitted on Dec 16, 2016 17:04:41. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Paleontologist99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17598 was submitted on Feb 23, 2017 04:22:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am ready for a fresh start.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Paleontologist99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla, I have been gone for 6 months now. I am sorry for evading the block of 50.196.213.1 almost 2 years ago. I promise that for now on, I will follow Wikipedia rules. No more sockpuppetry, no more vandalism, and no more disruptive editing. I am not perfect. I, like everyone else, may make a few mistakes. They can be resolved. I promise that I will improve Wikipedia and to have a fresh start. Thank you for reading. --Paleontologist99 (talk) 17:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Although I had a lot of troubles with you in the past, you have, to the best of my knowledge, stayed away for at least six months. Indeed, it looks like you've stayed away for quite a bit longer than that. As such, and because you have addressed the concerns in your unblock request, I have lifted the block. Welcome back! You are welcome to blank out this page and your User:Paleontologist99 page if you wish. Yamla (talk) 17:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Paleontologist99! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:33, Tuesday, October 10, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Deaths in 2018

Hello, when you add people to the Deaths in 2018 page, please note that they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 20:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Languages by year of extinction

Hi, I don't think creating Category:Languages by year of extinction is a good idea. Yes, we do list the date of the death of the last speaker in the infobox of the language article, but that's not a meaningful enough piece of information to warrant being made the basis of categorisation. It doesn't usually make sense to try to pinpoint language death to a particular year as it's a drawn out process. For example, even when the last speaker is alive, the language is effectively dead if they have no-one to speak to in that language. And even if there is a community of speakers (or semi-speakers), it often happens that they will either not use that language between themselves (preferring a language of wider communication), or they will use it in limited domains, or in a paired-down form, and in neither case does it make much sense to think of the language as "alive". – Uanfala (talk) 08:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting.

File:WIKI locat.jpg

I forgot that the hometown stores on the Sears pages were NOT closing, thus having to revert. But thanks anyways!

Tornadosurvivor2011 (talk) 00:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please stop overcategorizing

Gambling companies established in do not go both in Entertainment companies and Companies established in the same year because Entertainment categories is a subcategory of Companies established....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Performing groups disestablished in the 2010s has been nominated for discussion

Category:Performing groups disestablished in the 2010s, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:25, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response

There is no need to delete Category:Performing groups disestablished in the 2010s. Paleontologist99 (talk) 22:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Paleontologist99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dates at Deaths in 2018

Please note that the new day isn't added until the LINT time has passed midnight. Your addition of 2 December has been reverted. --Marbe166 (talk) 08:21, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Space probes by year of decommissioning has been nominated for discussion

Category:Space probes by year of decommissioning, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — JFG ^talk 18:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Projects by year of disestablishment has been nominated for discussion

Category:Projects by year of disestablishment, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — JFG ^talk 18:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Generation Z

I notice you've recently created and added maybe 20 articles about people from the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting to Category:Generation Z. That's not really practical, we clearly can't add every article about every person born between the mid-1990s to mid-2000s, there would be thousands of articles. I could see adding articles about the generation itself, the way Category:Generation X has, but not individuals. --GRuban (talk) 00:54, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not everyone born between 1997-2002 is Generation Z. This is due to generation overlapping. Paleontologist99 (talk) 01:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're missing my point. Just Category:1998 births has 5,793 entries. Whatever years you're using, they're all going to have about that many per year. Are you planning to put 20,000+ articles about people in this category? If so, that's going to mean it's not it very useful. If not, what is your criteria for whom you're going to put in and whom not? --GRuban (talk) 04:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I put Category:Generation Z in ~ 20 pages because March For Our Lives openly stated that they are mostly Generation Z. Paleontologist99 (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I can't see that being written in the article. But if it were, I can see the reasonable compromise of putting March for Our Lives into the category, as a notable event for the generation. Not each participant in the march. Deal? --GRuban (talk) 19:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deal. However, some participants like David Hogg and Emma González said that they are in the generation. Also, anyone born in 2003 or later is automatically considered Generation Z. Paleontologist99 (talk) 21:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are now rejecting the compromise offered above and are explicitly talking about adding 20,000 - 75,000 articles into the category. That makes no sense. I echo GRuban's concerns, such a category would be entirely useless. I don't think the category should exist at all, but I wouldn't object to a category consisting of notable events, but not containing any people at all. Note, I'm an admin but my admin rights give me no additional powers here. I'm speaking as a regular Wikipedia editor. You are perfectly entitled to disagree, particularly if you can demonstrate that a category consisting of 20,000 - 75,000 articles would be useful. --Yamla (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, I will let you make the final decision on whether the category thould exist or not.Paleontologist99 (talk) 21:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't think it should. But I want to be clear, if you and GRuban come to a consensus that it should and a consensus on how to determine which articles to add to it (events only? Events and people?), you should absolutely ignore my preference and do what the two of you think is best. You are both acting in good faith. --Yamla (talk) 21:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the category could include events related to the generation as well as 2003-2013 births categories.Paleontologist99 (talk) 21:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To confirm, you want to include 10-20 XXXX_births categories, and remove the individual people? That would at least be usable, though I suspect some would argue with the specific years. I'd be OK with that. Thank you for your comments Yamla, appreciated. --GRuban (talk) 21:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding categories and portals to articles for unclear reasons.

Hey, I've noticed you've been adding categories and portals to various articles, connecting liberalism to left wing politics and also putting the liberalism portal into articles where the text of the article does not mention that philosophy. Liberalism is not really a philosophy that fits on the modern "left-right" axis; all modern democracies are essentially liberal in nature; being right- or left- wing in the context of that liberalism is what makes the different political philosophies in those countries work. Also, please don't categorize an article (especially a biography of a living person) where the text of the article does not mention the category explicitly. Thanks. --Jayron 32 17:54, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby categories

When creating categories such as Category:Rugby clubs disestablished in 1878, can you bear in mind that the schism did not happen until 1895 so it's not appropriate to add rugby league categories - and in any case, per WP:REDNOT, it's never appropriate to add red-link categories, either create them or don't add the category. Le Deluge (talk) 14:07, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your fantastic anti-vandalism work! You are doing great work, and it has not gone unnapreciated! Keep it up! Puddleglum ^2.0 18:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UAA reports

Please review the UAA guidelines carefully. Usernames should only be reported if they have edited in the last two or three weeks. UAA is for addressing "blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block". That is not the case for usernames that have not edited recently. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Defunct ex-gay organizations has been nominated for discussion

Category:Defunct ex-gay organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Millennials, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 23:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Opposition to Islam in the United States

You might be interested in the new discussion at Category talk:Opposition to Islam in the United States. I hope to see you there. DougHill (talk) 17:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Beata Thunberg" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beata Thunberg. Since you had some involvement with the Beata Thunberg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Captainllama (talk) 21:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake?

Were these edits to JPL's user page a mistake?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They were intended to align with the profile. Paleontologist99 (talk) 21:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what that means... usually we do not edit other user's pages.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That means that the userboxes were added because they are directly based on what the user’s page says, especially the anti-smoking one. Paleontologist99 (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Netball teams by year of establishment

A tag has been placed on Category:Netball teams by year of establishment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Generation Beta" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Generation Beta. Since you had some involvement with the Generation Beta redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Misinformation related to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This is a highly visible article. Please read WP:RM and if you still think the article title should be changed, you can initiate a move request on the talk page. - MrX 🖋 11:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Paleontologist99. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cyril Ramaphosa, you may be blocked from editing. Paleontologist99 (talk) 04:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Defunct netball teams

A tag has been placed on Category:Defunct netball teams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Hello! Your talk page seems rather long and full of old conversations. I suggest you begin archiving. Bots are available for automated archiving. You could also go to my talk page and copy the code at the beginning then change it to your talk page. Good luck! Nerd271 (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:User GenerationAlpha

Template:User GenerationAlpha has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mz7 (talk) 18:49, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1894 in rugby league

A tag has been placed on Category:1894 in rugby league requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding article on the coronavirus pandemic

Apologies if my edits were interpreted as disruptive, but I simply corrected a number of grammatical mistakes or issues with the spacing. On one occasion, a word from the German language was mistranslated ("radikaler" means "more radical" while "radikal" is equivalent to "radical"). Sincerely, OM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.43.30.163 (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@95.43.30.163: Please do not forget to sign your talk page post using four tildes. Paleontologist99 (talk) 17:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's a good point, I have the bad habit of occasionally forgetting to sign my posts. Cheers, OM 95.43.30.163 (talk) 21:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle warnings

Hello.

I am generally against automation of Wikipedia moderation tasks, so I guess I'm biased, but I wanted to point out to you that the Twinkle warning you gave on User talk:77.102.46.107 was unhelpful. The language in Template:uw-attempt2 explicitly accuses the warned user of editing in bad faith, while this user was clearly not trying to be disruptive. It is my understanding that a level-2 warning should be used only if a level-1 has already been given (I don't use Twinkle, but that seems logical), in which case that was the wrong warning to use. I dislike the Twinkle warnings in general, but at least Template:uw-attempt1 assumes good faith.

I'll be removing your warning. I urge you to be more mindful of what the Twinkle warnings you're using actually say, so as to avoid biting the noobs.

Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 16:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PJvanMill: Please note that I may occasionally make false positives. If they are, then they can be removed.

Okay, just consider not using the level-2 edit filter warning with a specified article, because the language assumes bad faith. Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 19:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Record labels disestablished in 2019

A tag has been placed on Category:Record labels disestablished in 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Gun Girl" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gun Girl. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#Gun Girl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Bush knew" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bush knew. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#Bush knew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"9/11 conspiracy claims regarding Jews or Israel" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 9/11 conspiracy claims regarding Jews or Israel. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#9/11 conspiracy claims regarding Jews or Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --BDD (talk) 18:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Millennials RFC

Hello. If you've got the time, please vote on my RFC on Talk:Millennials about modifying the lead.--CherokeeJack1 (talk) 06:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CherokeeJack1: I strongly support the proposed lead for the Millennials article. A 15 year span that spans approximately between 1981-1996 has been more widely accepted and cited over the past two years. In addition, I also support the removal of Category:21st century from the article as a result. Paleontologist99 (talk) 06:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Jones article

I disagree with what you put on the Alex Jones article, how he is a source of “fake news”. Lots of his news is confirmed and sourced. The page is protected so no changes are able to be made by me, I would appreciate a response back, thanks! SteelTS (talk) 06:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy theories by country

Hello, Paleontologist99. I motivated my removal of your categorization of 'Conspiracy theories in ...' in the Philosophy categories, but unfortunately you undid those edits without any comment. Could you please explain why to you it seems that 'conspiracy theories' are part of 'philosophy'? To me it's like you mean one could declare quackery (or any pseudoscience) philosophy also, which is of course nonsense. Maybe also ask yourself why the main category, Category:Conspiracy theories (and cf. Category:Fringe theories etc), is not in Category:Philosophy (you might like to try and see how long it would last there and how many reverts it would take you to get blocked for it). I am afraid you are underestimating things. Greeting, Eissink (talk) 08:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Petroleum companies

Please see my proposal to upmerge Category:Petroleum companies established in 1959 and Category:Petroleum companies established in 1988 Hugo999 (talk) 10:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Languages by year of extinction

A tag has been placed on Category:Languages by year of extinction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Esports teams disestablished in 2012

A tag has been placed on Category:Esports teams disestablished in 2012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in India

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reference for the "Vintage"/"Obsolete" terms applied to Apple OS releases?

The Vintage and Obsolete Products page at Apple describes the "Vintage" and "Obsolete" categories for hardware, but I can't find any page directly indicating that they apply to operating system releases as well.

I'd love to have references for that and for the support cycle for OS releases, to apply to OS release pages, in the hopes of squelching the edit wars that changes to the support_status parameter for iOS releases seem to provoke. Guy Harris (talk) 08:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Consulting firms disestablished in 2019

A tag has been placed on Category:Consulting firms disestablished in 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Assassinated Ghanaian politicians

A tag has been placed on Category:Assassinated Ghanaian politicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

/* Important notices */ Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SummerPhD^v2.0 19:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hungarian conspiracy theorists

A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian conspiracy theorists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Vernon Coleman

Hello Paleontologist99, could you please explain why you changed the categories of Vernon Coleman from British Conspiracy Theorists to English Conspiracy Theorists? MrEarlGray (talk) 10:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conspiracy theories in Hungary

A tag has been placed on Category:Conspiracy theories in Hungary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:15, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Useless edits

Please don't make these kinds of useless edits unless they're accompanied by changes that actually make a difference to how the page is rendered. - dcljr (talk) 13:38, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Japanese Holocaust deniers

A tag has been placed on Category:Japanese Holocaust deniers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Steven Brandenburg" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Steven Brandenburg. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 2#Steven Brandenburg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Slovak conspiracy theorists

A tag has been placed on Category:Slovak conspiracy theorists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conspiracy theories in Slovakia

A tag has been placed on Category:Conspiracy theories in Slovakia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Controversies in Slovakia

A tag has been placed on Category:Controversies in Slovakia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Holocaust denial in Japan has been nominated for merging

Category:Holocaust denial in Japan has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bulgarian conspiracy theorists

A tag has been placed on Category:Bulgarian conspiracy theorists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Emirati conspiracy theorists

A tag has been placed on Category:Emirati conspiracy theorists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Estonian conspiracy theorists

A tag has been placed on Category:Estonian conspiracy theorists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conspiracy theories in Bulgaria

A tag has been placed on Category:Conspiracy theories in Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conspiracy theories in the United Arab Emirates

A tag has been placed on Category:Conspiracy theories in the United Arab Emirates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:35, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conspiracy theories in Estonia

A tag has been placed on Category:Conspiracy theories in Estonia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:36, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Filipino conspiracy theorists

A tag has been placed on Category:Filipino conspiracy theorists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conspiracy theories in the Philippines

A tag has been placed on Category:Conspiracy theories in the Philippines indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Brazil

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Brazil indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Bulgaria

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Egypt

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Egypt indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Estonia

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Estonia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Lebanon

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Lebanon indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Malta

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Malta indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Mexico

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:47, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in South Africa

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in South Africa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in the Netherlands

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in the Netherlands indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in the Philippines

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in the Philippines indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in the United Arab Emirates

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in the United Arab Emirates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Turkey

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Turkey indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust denial in Ukraine

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust denial in Ukraine indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maltese conspiracy theorists

A tag has been placed on Category:Maltese conspiracy theorists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conspiracy theories in Malta

A tag has been placed on Category:Conspiracy theories in Malta indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian conspiracy theorists

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian conspiracy theorists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conspiracy theories in Ukraine

A tag has been placed on Category:Conspiracy theories in Ukraine indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Antisemitism in Bulgaria

A tag has been placed on Category:Antisemitism in Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:25, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Antisemitism in Malta

A tag has been placed on Category:Antisemitism in Malta indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Antisemitism in the Philippines

A tag has been placed on Category:Antisemitism in the Philippines indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Antisemitism in the United Arab Emirates

A tag has been placed on Category:Antisemitism in the United Arab Emirates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:36, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Controversies in Bulgaria

A tag has been placed on Category:Controversies in Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Controversies in Estonia

A tag has been placed on Category:Controversies in Estonia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Racism in Bulgaria

A tag has been placed on Category:Racism in Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Racism in the Philippines

A tag has been placed on Category:Racism in the Philippines indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Racism in the United Arab Emirates

A tag has been placed on Category:Racism in the United Arab Emirates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 11:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Discrimination in Bulgaria

A tag has been placed on Category:Discrimination in Bulgaria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Discrimination in the Philippines

A tag has been placed on Category:Discrimination in the Philippines indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Petroleum companies by year of disestablishment has been nominated for deletion

Category:Petroleum companies by year of disestablishment has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Conglomerate companies disestablished in 2018

A tag has been placed on Category:Conglomerate companies disestablished in 2018 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Internet properties disestablished in 2023

A tag has been placed on Category:Internet properties disestablished in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Retail companies disestablished in 2023

A tag has been placed on Category:Retail companies disestablished in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mass media companies disestablished in 2023

A tag has been placed on Category:Mass media companies disestablished in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2023 in Internet culture

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 in Internet culture indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainment companies disestablished in 2023

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainment companies disestablished in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:White nationalism in Austria

A tag has been placed on Category:White nationalism in Austria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Zoos disestablished in 1993

A tag has been placed on Category:Zoos disestablished in 1993 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Zoos established in 2022

A tag has been placed on Category:Zoos established in 2022 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conspiracy theories in Iceland has been nominated for deletion

Category:Conspiracy theories in Iceland has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Zoos established in 1752

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Zoos established in 1752 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 3 § Category:Libraries by year of establishment

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 3 § Category:Libraries by year of establishment on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 19 § Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 19 § Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Agriculture companies established in 1924

A tag has been placed on Category:Agriculture companies established in 1924 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. AusLondonder (talk) 17:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pakistani companies disestablished in 2019

A tag has been placed on Category:Pakistani companies disestablished in 2019 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]