User talk:Pager1989
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Pager1989, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Animal Instincts (book), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ignatzmice•talk 06:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Animal Instincts (book)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Animal Instincts (book) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ignatzmice•talk 06:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- The usual criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is explained here. Very basically, we only summarise information that's already published in reliable sources that're independent of the subject. We do this to ensure both that our information is verifiable, and that it can be written neutrally. As far as to whether an e-book is "web content", I think you'd have a real hard time arguing otherwise. In any event, it still doesn't address the inclusion criterion WP:N, which it would need to to be kept in the long term anyhow. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers, WilyD 13:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Err, you asked about the formatting. If it were a physical book, the process might have been different, but the outcome would still be the same. WP:N is the main inclusion/non-inclusion criterion for articles. Articles are only written on subjects where reliable third parties are publishing the information. For a book, that would mean book reviews, etc. in publications (newspapers, magazines, journals, whatnot) that aren't associated with the author or publisher of the book. WilyD 16:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)