User talk:Paddy Pillow

Hi Wiki-people, can please anyone review my article? It is a translation from German Wikipedia. I would like to know if it is o.k. Thanks. Paddy Pillow (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catholic Integrated Commuity (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What would especially help is all major independent news about it overall; no announcements or notices and note that notability cannot be inherited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Catholic Integrated Commuity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catholic Integrated Commuity has been accepted

Catholic Integrated Commuity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 10:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning up bare URL's

Hi @I dream of horses:

thank you for beginning to clean up bare URL's in my first article Catholic Integrated Community! May I ask you to help me still a bit further on in doing this work?

Paddy Pillow (talk) 19:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think you meant to talk to TAnthony. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pope em?

Regarding Catholic Integrated Community#People...

Pope em? friend and patronize?

I was looking through the history to see if there was vandalism, but that's how it's been since your first edit. Doesn't feel right to me. wbm1058 (talk) 21:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pope em? Regarding Catholic Integrated Community#People...

Dear wbm1058,

please have a look at references 9, 11, 18, 19, 35, 36 and 56 - these proof pope em being fried and patronize. But I will find some more and insert them directly under "person". So thank you for your notice.

Paddy Pillow (talk) 03:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think you mean patron. Patronize can have a different meaning. And I realized that "em" was an abbreviation for Emeritus. wbm1058 (talk) 03:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Traudl Wallbrecher (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Try splitting the content up into subsections. You may want to address the inline citation placement, there are a few WP:OVERCITE issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Traudl Wallbrecher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 11:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Paddy Pillow, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 11:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]