Jump to content

User talk:Pacphobia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Pacphobia! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

"Lineal"

[edit]

Greetings. A formatting tip—lineal championship should absolutely not be displayed as "Lineal". It is simply "lineal", with no italics or title-case capital. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I really wouldn't recommend this. Capitalising and italicising the word "lineal" goes against any and all Wikipedia MOS guidelines. Same way as weight classes are not capitalised—it is a concept, not a proper noun. This is basic stuff. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This RfC also covered all that stuff in detail, which resulted in a clear consensus. Please read it. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Are you really sure you want to edit war over this? I can tell you straight up that you don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to this formatting issue. The RfC at WikiProject Boxing (to which I'm linking you for a second time) came to a clear consensus on how to format "lineal", weight classes and sanctioning bodies. Again I advise you to read that, as well as MOS:EMPHASIS, MOS:CAPS and MOS:TITLE. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, I'd like to point you to this section at MOS:TITLE:

There are cases in which the title should be in neither italics nor quotation marks (though many are capitalized): [...] Descriptive titles: a reference to or description of a work or part of a work when not using its actual or conventional title: 137th graduation address, conference keynote speech, an introductory aria, Satie's furniture music, State of the Union address, Nixon's Checkers speech; also: the season finale of Game of Thrones, not the "Season Finale" of Game of Thrones

... which applies directly to lineal championships/titles. They are merely a conceptual achievement—one that is neither handed out in the form of a championship belt nor granted as an official status by a boxing governing body (TBRB does not count, as they make no mention of the word "lineal" on their website). Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mainstream media also uses lower case without italics: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty then, I tried my best. See you at WP:DRN. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 12:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Manny Pacquiao. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. . Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Manny Pacquiao. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Pacphobia reported by User:Mac Dreamstate (Result: ). Thank you. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 13:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Manny Pacquiao. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- GB fan 19:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Manny Pacquiao

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Pacphobia reported by User:Mac Dreamstate (Result: Blocked). If you continue to make personal attacks (like 'cancer on the Wikipedia community') you are likely to have a short career. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An olive branch (or I think that's what it's called..)

[edit]

Despite us getting off on the wrong foot, I genuinely wish to say nice job with putting the list of lineal champions together—the list was very much needed on Wikipedia. Work with other editors and it'll look really good. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lineal titles, take #2

[edit]

So much for that olive branch. Do you really want to do this again? You have no chance of 'winning' on this formatting issue, as multiple sources (which I dig up earlier) support lineal titles being presented in lower case without italics—not "Lineal". If we end up edit-warring again, with insults aplenty from you, I propose we take this straight to WP:DRN. If no response, then perhaps WP:AN3 could have a look if it gets hectic. Which one will it be? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, I am trying to get the formatting standardised—it's called being proactive. I'll certainly need that vote of good luck(!) if this keeps up... Mac Dreamstate (talk) 05:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mayweather's record is a long and complicated one, and MOS:BOX was still in its early stages when I last tried to spruce it up. I'll give his record another try only after the MOS is absolutely finalised across WP. Just to make it clear, I haven't made up any of these formats myself just for fun—I'm simply going by WP's own MOS regarding capitalisation and italics. Many boxing articles are still a mess, so a new level of standardisation must be applied.. slowly by surely. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 06:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TKO

[edit]

Per this, you might want to know:

"In boxing, for a KO to occur a fighter must fail to beat the count, so TKO refers to any situation when the referee, cornerman, physician, or fighter stops the fight any time during a round when there is no ten count"

Khan was down, the referee was about to start counting, but waved it off instead. That's a TKO. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 05:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 August

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of boxing in the Philippines
added links pointing to José López, Terry Allen, Manuel Medina and Edgar Sosa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of boxing quadruple champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manuel Vargas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sugar Ray Robinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Bell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Manuel Márquez / WBO Super titles

[edit]

The WBO honorary titles that Márquez held should not be deleted as they are sourceable from the WBO's website, albeit with a lot of searching using the year and month filters. It's the same reason that WBC Diamond and "Champion in recess" are included in that section. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really remember Marquez winning a WBO Super at Lightweight and Jr welter. He just won the full version of WBO but not as the Super champion status. Can you provide me a source or link confirming that award? Pacphobia (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's an interesting one, and I also didn't know about it until recently. Have a look at the WBO Super subsection for an explanation on what the "title" actually is. It won't mentioned at the list of current world boxing champions, because it doesn't work in the same way as WBA Super. The WBO's version is just an honorary award, like WBO Champion of the Decade; not a championship status that can be won or lost in the ring, and has nothing whatsoever to do with full championship or interim status (meaning there's no such thing as a "Regular" WBO champion).
If you look at the top of the WBO website's champions section, there's a detailed search function. That's what I used to narrow down the periods of time when Márquez (along with others like Hopkins, Calzaghe, etc.) held the WBO Super recognition. For example, compare the rankings from April 2009 (WBO > 2009 > April) to May 2009; that is when they gave him Super recognition at lightweight for the first time. Likewise for February/March 2012; he carried over his Super recognition to light welterweight. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Joe Bowker
added a link pointing to Jimmy Walsh
List of lineal boxing world champions
added a link pointing to Eddie Martin
Pete Herman
added a link pointing to Joe Lynch
Terry McGovern (boxer)
added a link pointing to George Dixon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steve Cruz (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding of inappropriate cyberboxingzone.com cites

[edit]

I am noticing the repeated adding of links to a champs list at cyberboxingzone.com across many boxer biography articles, especially to their leads, where such cites tend to be seen as unnecessary. This is giving the impression of a deliberate promotion of this specific stats site. I am removing all cites having a link to the champs list page. I advise that this practice be ceased because if others agree that the adding of promotional links is occurring, it could be used as a pretense for administrative action, up to and including a block. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 17:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note that navboxes go after the "External links' section per WP:SECTIONORDER. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 17:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify, with an example edit, the part about the navboxes? I might also be mistakenly doing it in some articles. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Like discussed on my talk page, I meant "succession boxes" to be more precise. They are considered a form of navboxes, though, because the section ordering guidelines say to show "other navboxes" after the succession boxes. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 22:23, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stevie, I just want to clarify to you it's not a promotional links. If you notice on my edits, I only add (CBZ lineal champions list) link on articles of boxers who held the lineal championships and CBZ website is the only reliable source I found on internet. There's also the linealchamps.com website but their lineal champions lists are very questionable. If you still see it as a promotional link, then could you advice me or somehow show me how can I use that link properly from cbz website without violating WP:LEAD? Pacphobia (talk) 12:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
CBZ the only reliable source on the Internet for this information? That is ridiculous on its head. Also, per WP:LEAD, we normally don't use cites in the lead for information that is already cited in the rest of the article. There is no necessity for these CBZ links in leads. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 13:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I say yes. CBZ has the official list of lineal champions in boxing so why look for other sources which are not reliable? Are you telling me that I'm not allowed to use CBZ website for linking purposes even in the body section of an article? Pacphobia (talk) 14:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I really like the CBZ site, and the lineal champions article on here, but I can totally see why it would be considered questionable to be used on WP. If a list of content is supported by just one site, across the whole Internet, then unfortunately it'll likely to be torn to shreds by WP:RS and WP:PRIMARY. Other than CBZ, are there any other sources for a complete list of lineal champions, like a magazine or something in print? It'd help a lot. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The linealchamps.com website is also a good source but they only recognize 8 divisions maybe I could try it. I really cant find any better alternative source other than CBZ. I did all the searching on google but all the results are linked from CBZ website. CBZ has a great historic records and informations of old time boxing and they also have bio and accurate records of boxers so its more like a boxing history and record keeper website. I was really surprised that some users really hate this website. Even a bio of a boxer from that website cannot be linked on boxing articles WTF.. Or maybe Im dealing with a user who doesn't even know about boxing history at all? Pacphobia (talk) 13:39, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed a few of these citations and don't think they belong. The lead summarizes the most important things in the article. Try to put the citations in the body of the article if it would be improved by having a citation to support that material. For some of the material you are adding the citations to, you can probably find a better source than CBZ. CBZ has the problems that Mac Dreamstate mentioned.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 01:15, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Pacphobia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the material you included in the above article was copied from http://www.tbrb.org/charter/, a copyright web page. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Boxing Zone citation

[edit]

Hi, Can you explain why you added the Cyber Boxing Zone citation to the Jackie Paterson article after this sentence: "The world title fight, held at Hampden Park in Glasgow, lasted only a minute, as Paterson caught Kane early in the first round putting him down twice, before he was counted out the second time."?--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake I put the citation in the wrong sentence. Moved the reference here In June 1943, Paterson fought former flyweight champion Peter Kane from Golborne in Lancashire for the vacant World flyweight championship. Pacphobia (talk) 04:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What parts of that sentence does the reference support?--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"for the vacant World flyweight championship". Paterson won that fight and claimed the lineal title. Pacphobia (talk) 06:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But that Cyber Boxing Zone list doesn't mention their fight or how Paterson won the title.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 19:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pacphobia (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #17714 was submitted on Mar 10, 2017 01:44:53. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE

[edit]

IP block exempt

[edit]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this userright to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I really appreciate you help. Pacphobia (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Japanese boxing world champions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages José Antonio Aguirre and Adrián Hernández. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeff Horn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orthodox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:CeferinoGarcia.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:CeferinoGarcia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tracy Callis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mickey Walker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ward - Kovalev II.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ward - Kovalev II.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tracy Callis.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tracy Callis.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:57, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Golovkin - Alvarez poster.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Golovkin - Alvarez poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Manny Pacquiao into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Text was copied into Boxing career of Manny Pacquiao without attribution. I've provided the requisite attribution in this case, but please remember to do this next time! Thanks, /wiae /tlk 19:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

Didn't mean to revert you just now. I was going after the same edit as you! -- Dolotta (talk) 13:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Pacphobia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manny Pacquiao undue weight tag

[edit]

Talk:Manny Pacquiao#Tag removed 80.235.147.186 (talk) 05:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE expiring - March 2019

[edit]

Hello Pacphobia, I'm working on some routine cleanup and see you have not made use of the ip block exemption flag on your account for over a year. This will be removed in about a week, unless you reply below that you still have a need for this flag. This will have no impact on your ability to read Wikipedia. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 12:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. As your account has been inactive for a year and there was no reply above, this flag has been removed. This will have no impact on general editing, however if you are trying to edit from certain blocked IP addresses you may need to move to another address or request a new exemption. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 20:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manny Pacquiao vs. Keith Thurman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Nery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manny Pacquiao vs. Keith Thurman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Nery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Canelo-Chavez.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.tbrb.org/successions/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Transnational Boxing Rankings Board saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 21:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lineal boxing champions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 04:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Springs Toledo for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Springs Toledo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springs Toledo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]