User talk:PacoDaKing14

Welcome!

Hello, PacoDaKing14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Kevin Kolb have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type {{helpme}} on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Biker Biker (talk) 16:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Matt Flynn was changed by PacoDaKing14 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867094 on 2013-03-31T16:14:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Matt Flynn. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Eye snore (PC) 16:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Matt Flynn, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SGMD1 ^Talk/_Contribs 16:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Matt Flynn. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SGMD1 ^Talk/_Contribs 17:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Webb, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Biker Biker (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Why are continuing to add unsourced content to biographies of living persons? This is in direct violation to Wikipedia's policy WP:Biographies of living persons and jeopardizes your editing privilege. Please stop. Tiderolls 18:02, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 18:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have convinced me that you will not follow Wikipedia policy. Please read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. You must cite your source for changes made to biograpies of living persons. Tiderolls 18:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PacoDaKing14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block ive been blocked because my brither is a football rumor addict. i was going to the store and he was on my account. ive put a password on my computer and im wondering if you could unblockme. if you dont i understand.

Decline reason:

your account, having been used by another person, is compromised and cannot therefore be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've reformatted your post as you did not follow the instructions in the block notice. You may remove the request if its not what you had in mind. I would advise you that it more than likely going to be declined in its present state. I would advise that you remove the request and read WP:GAB before requesting unblock. Tiderolls 19:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PacoDaKing14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im sorry for my falseinformation. ive posted online rumors. when i find rumors i get really get crazy and post it evry where. i will not do it agian nor post without a reliable soures. sorry for all the trouble. im new at this stuff.

Decline reason:

compromised account.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

]]

Block extension

I have extended to the block on this account to an indefinite period based on the user's claim that the account is compromised. Tiderolls 20:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]