User talk:PMDahl2017

Welcome!

Hello, PMDahl2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PMDahl2017! You created a thread called Creating a Company Wikipedia Page without sources at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by User:Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, PMDahl2017, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as International Institute for Learning (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 08:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your appear to be operating this account and International Institute for Learning. While that account is blocked you should act as if the block applies to this account also. Block evasion is taken seriously. Cabayi (talk) 08:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: Is there a WP:SPI? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Deepfriedokra. There were sequential rename requests, 106238 & 106239 that were so disingenuous I AGFd, linked the requests to each other, and left the note above. Looks like the AGF was misplaced.

From the comment below it appears they're both socks of IIL Global (talk · contribs). Cabayi (talk) 21:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IIL Global. Cabayi (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ima go ahead and block as WP:SOCK -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do i change my username?

Please assist PMDahl2017 (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection with International Institute for Learning (talk · contribs)? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock!!

Not sure why I've been blocked... please assist IIL Global (talk) 18:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked from editing -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Renamer note: We will not be able to ~~unblock~~ renameyou till we determine you are not evading your block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:PMDahl2017/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:PMDahl2017/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 18:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, PMDahl2017. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page User:PMDahl2017/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat, as well as Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]