User talk:PCM092022
Links to draft articles
[edit]Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Surya Bhanu Pratap Singh. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rohit Jangid
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
PCM092022 (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Rohit Jangid
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
PCM092022 (talk) 15:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Please allow drafts to be reviewed
[edit]PCM092022, please do not move drafts to mainspace, but leave them to be reviewed by an Articles for Creation reviewer. You moved Draft:Abhijet Raajput to mainspace even though there wasn't a single independent source, just five paid sources / press releases, some of which were added multiple times with different titles and URLs. Most of the information in the article was unsourced, and footnotes had been added at random places in the text – that's also a sign that a draft should not be moved to mainspace. When you had moved the draft, you placed a misleading template on the draft creator's user talk page, implying that you had carried out an AfC review. Please don't do that. (You have put a couple of such templates above as well – nobody has reviewed Rohit Jangid, you moved it yourself without a review, and it looks like it is also not adequately sourced.) Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 18:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Rohit Jangid moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Rohit Jangid, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 19:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)