User talk:OxfordLaw

October 2018

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Natureium (talk) 17:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I came to comment on this in reaction to this edit, the edit summary of which seems to key on complaints about posting of an allegedly inaccurate source but the edit did not remove such a posting. This pushed my WP:DUE hot-button and prompted this comment. As the warning above from another editor says, please discuss your issues on the article talk page rather than engaging in an edit war in the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:19, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saudi Arabia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Nabataeus (talk) 04:51, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OxfordLaw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]