User talk:Ouzel Ring

http://stats.grok.se/en/201004/Hawthornden%20Prize

Articles for deletion nomination of Weaver v NATFHE

I have nominated Weaver v NATFHE, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weaver v NATFHE. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. qö₮$@37 (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Fastily has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy2010 15:25, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it or I'll block you--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:34, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Both your post and your edit summary on Mick's Talk page were wholly inappropriate. Don't do it again or you may be blocked without warning. --HighKing (talk) 16:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jac16888 ^Talk 16:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually its indef and its for attacking other users. You were warned--Jac16888 ^Talk 16:58, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Dingley

Thank you for to looking beyond and exposing User:AnmaFinotera (although (s)he made a few further dubious edits that you might want to investigate). But the point has been made that this is not the place for me - and that is right. People like User:AnmaFinotera, Fastily and MickNacPaddyWack...are the wiki community and the project is succeeding despite them not because of them....well well it keeps them off the street I suppose. Ouzel Ring (talk) 18:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, but I'd note that I would still support blocking you anyway. Your behaviour is unacceptable, so either change it or stay blocked. I would point out the blocking policy though and remind you that "indef" means "until something changes" rather that "infinite". If you apologized for your recent actions and offered to behave in future, I'm sure you'd find admins willing to listen. The point of WP:NPA is that we just don't do this. You might wish to, you might even have reason to, but the whole edifice works better if we agree that none of us will act on it. You have to agree to abide by that, or else you will just be blocked, and stay blocked. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]