User talk:OstaraIK

Welcome

Hello OstaraIK and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Château de Montbrun, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Château de Montbrun (Lot). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

the article that is present on Wikipedia doesn’t correspond with french version which has been corrected through by our employee and the volunteers. Please help removing a non-Sense info from Wikipedia regarding Montbrun Castle and add this historically verified info.

(Redacted)

Please help me with...

OstaraIK (talk) 23:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! First, it sounds like you have declared a conflict of interest with the subject, since you refer to "our employee and the volunteers" having edited the French page. Because of that, you should not edit the article in question directly.

Second, I'm not quite clear which article you're referring to. There are multiple castles named Montbrun, which are listed at the disambiguation page of the same name. Or, is this a castle not listed, which needs a new article? We need clarification.

Finally, you mentioned no reliable sources in your suggested edits. With no way to verify the material, it's unlikely the changes will be made. —C.Fred (talk) 00:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Château de Montbrun have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please see people's comments above. Firstly, changes to Wikipedia need to have reliable sources to reference them. Secondly, if you own or work for Château de Montbrun you should probably not edit the article. Tacyarg (talk) 01:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello OstaraIK, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Château de Montbrun have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Château de Montbrun (Lot)

Hi OstaraIK - I've reverted your removal of the disambiguation link from Château de Montbrun to Château de Montbrun (Lot), as I think this link is useful to readers. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 11:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Château de Montbrun

Hi OstaraIK

The article on Château de Montbrun is now a mess. It is hard to understand and the formatting is strange. You have again removed the link to Château de Montbrun (Lot), with the comment "There is no other Château- Fort de Montbrun", but it appears there is - certainly Wikipedia has an article on both.

You have said you work at the castle so you have a clear WP:Conflict of interest. If promotion is your aim, I don't think the current article will work well for you because of its lack of clarity and the way it looks.

I think you are in danger of being blocked from editing. May I suggest that you discuss this at Talk:Château de Montbrun before making any other changes?

Thanks, Tacyarg (talk) 22:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Complete new submission of information

The current info on Wikipedia has not got the right facts on Montbrun celts village and the Castle of Montbrun .. I as a co-owner of the domaine have absolute right to delete and edit the correct historical and Ownership info on Wikipedia. Thanks for your understanding,

Kind regards, Iryna Ostara Lamers Korotun OstaraIK (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OstaraIK. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Château de Montbrun, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Château de Montbrun - again

Your latest additions and changes were totally unsourced, and unclear/unintelligible. I assume English is not your native language, and looking at the warnings above, you have been warned about such edits before. Please stop. - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added info

Dear user, The information that I put as regards to our property hads a historical value and no conflict of interest, but ignorance of people who correct it really impresses. OstaraIK (talk) 19:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

I have reverted your changes to the Château de Montbrun article as they made the text less clear. Tacyarg (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What knowledge do you have of this historical property ? I am not a precessional editor and find it difficult to write on Wikipedia due to the Cc and various abbreviations.. OstaraIK (talk) 19:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. None of us on Wikipedia are professional editors - everyone is a volunteer. I agree there are a lot of abbreviations and jargon. You might find it helpful to look at the Help:Editing page. Ask questions here if there are specific things you would like to know. Best wishes. Tacyarg (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you comprehension and advice ❤️🙏🏻 OstaraIK (talk) 20:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 18:24, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is extremely difficult to make corrections that are true , and they are constantly getting deleted . But those who have no idea or knowledge able to block the true info. The owners have the papers of the history and archives and have been interviewed therefore either all the information that had been written years ago has to be deleted and allow the expert to write or let the owners to add the adequate info. OstaraIK (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]