User talk:Osarjusz

Osarjusz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Osarjusz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Osarjusz. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Bayard (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Bayard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank Bayard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Bayard (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Insufficient notability. Fails WP:GNG. I have already redirected all the stubs for his predecessors back to 1929 to Grand Master of the Teutonic Order#1929–present, with one exception: Norbert Klein was a bishop, hence article-worthy.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Bayard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank Bayard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Clarityfiend:. Why would you literally remove several articles that were already there and hadn't had any notability issues in the past? I don't get it, it's not like wikipedia's server are going to burn Osarjusz (talk) 22:21, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that they don't have notability issues. It's just that nobody noticed them until now. Lots of hoaxes, for example, don't get spotted for years. Also, standards have become more strict as time goes on. These articles have inadequate sourcing, so WP:GNG. is not satisfied. The office itself is just not enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i guess wikipedia isn't the free encyclopedia as i have always thought and as time goes on there would be less articles instead of more Osarjusz (talk) 22:37, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also i don't understand why some random sportsmen are important just because they are sportsmen, it is just a tile after all Osarjusz (talk) 22:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frank Bayard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Bayard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Bayard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 11:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]