User talk:Os Cangaceiros

Os Cangaceiros (Yippie!)

Essjay

We can't include original research and the editions you've added had both POV and OR issues. JoshuaZ 01:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Essjay controversy

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Essjay controversy. As a member of the Wikipedia community, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information of living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper verification. Thank you.--Leflyman^Talk 01:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you restore this content again you will be blocked. (→Netscott) 01:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Essjay controversy. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Leflyman^Talk 01:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Yet another PERMANENT, ETERNAL cyber-testimony that wikipedia admins will PULL OUT ALL THE STOPS AND BEND THE RULES when it comes to protecting their own "kind"...

You guys are LYING, but the TRUTH speaks for itself. How can it be OR or libelous when it is cited to an edit that Essjay himself published, at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gay&diff=prev&oldid=14917790

Os Cangaceiros (Yippie!)

Among other issues, Essjay never said anywhere that he was straight, so for all we know those edits were by Robbie and are completely separate (and if you think that this is about the evil admins protecting their own, I'm an admin, and I argued for keeping the article). JoshuaZ 01:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? We certainly know what account the edits were made on. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gay&diff=prev&oldid=14917790

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gay&diff=prev&oldid=14917790

Os Cangaceiros (Yippie!)

And do you have any reason whatsoever to think that Essjay is not gay? JoshuaZ 01:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Noseoutframe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Noseoutframe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gdo01 17:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gdo01 17:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gdo01 17:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Free Speech Movement. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AngelOfSadness talk 17:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. AngelOfSadness talk 17:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're currently listed to be blocked. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 17:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contribution to your talk page has been reverted or removed. Although this is your talk page, making such edits are considered vandalism and will be reverted. If you continue, this talk page may be protected from editing. Thank you. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 17:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Blocked 48 Hours

You have been blocked for major breaches of the civility policy and revert warring. Understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative project and personal attacks on editors are not acceptable. Please take this time to cool down and read through these policies. If you believe this block is unfair you may post {{unblock|your reason}} on your user talk page.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Noseoutframe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Noseoutframe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Yippie poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yippie poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Noseoutframe.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Noseoutframe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 04:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

beanfield

I've replied on the beanfield chat page :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC) PS - Is your name related to the French OsC ?[reply]