Jump to content

User talk:Oronsay/Archive 32

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 25Archive 30Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35

Wikidata weekly summary #538

Wikidata weekly summary #539

Women in Red October 2022

Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

  • New instant-access collections:
    • SpringerLink and Springer Nature
    • Project MUSE
    • Taylor & Francis
    • ASHA
    • Loeb
  • Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

Wikidata weekly summary #540

WiR topic for the year 2023

Thank you, Oronsay, for encouraging us to establish Women in Red's Topic for year-long focus in 2023. As a result of the discussions on the WiR talk page, the consensus appears to be "Peace & Diplomacy". I've added it to the Ideas page under 2023. As you may have seen, there was also considerable interest in "Education" which we should try to support either by emphasis in our monthly priorities or by introducing something new. (cc Rosiestep)--Ipigott (talk) 16:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Good to hear from you, @Ipigott. With the addition of diplomacy, it will hopefully be broad enough to attract a good haul of new articles. Oronsay (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: September 2022





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

essa may ranapiri

Kia ora Oronsay, I hope you are well! I just wondered about your addition of essa may ranapiri to List of New Zealand women writers. I wouldn't have thought non-binary people should be included in lists of women, but maybe there is a consensus on this I'm not aware of? I had a look at MOS:NB but this doesn't seem to directly assist. I have also added them to List of New Zealand writers. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Kia ora Oronsay, I was just dropping in to say thanks for your interest in the article and raise the same matter. essa's been clear about not being a man or a woman (see this interview), so I'll remove them from the list. Thanks! Avocadobabygirl (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Sorry about that, @Avocadobabygirl and @Chocmilk03. Poor assumption on my part – I was just looking for another incoming link. I'm concerned that notability may not be met as a longlisting is far short of winning a national award. Oronsay (talk) 22:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
No problem! I've put the word out for anyone who can add more details that would support notability and completeness. Avocadobabygirl (talk) 22:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Likewise, no worries at all, I thought I might've missed something. :) I agree it might be a bit of a close-run thing, although there is coverage of ranapiri in some additional secondary sources which can be added to the article and may support WP:BASIC: [1] [2] [3] [4] (a couple of these reference the controversy over an apparently transphobic review of ranapiri's work published in the New Zealand Listener). I can add these later after work, or @Avocadobabygirl feel free? Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #541

Review of Page?

Hello, Oronsay! I saw you are active in WikiProject Women, and was hoping you could help. I recently inquired to @Ipigott and @MarioGom with assistance removing the conflict of interest flag on Fawn Weaver. They requested I get an experienced editor to review the page content further, as some COI and UPE-related contributions are still a part of the article.

I did try to remove the flag manually in 2021 after learning of Fawn and her work with POCs - though as stated on Ipigott's Talk page, I don't have a conflict of interest with Fawn (I did edit the page without understanding its history, admittedly). I have now completed a thorough review of the content and citations, and everything now seems to be accurate and appropriate, though I would defer to you and your judgment. Would you be willing to review the page contents, and remove the flag (and any additional problematic content I may have missed, if there is any) once you have?

Of course, the other editors mentioned are free to contribute to the conversation and edits, if they have anything to add. Thank you! Jerr1966 (talk) 11:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello Oronsay, Thanks very much for creating the article Margaret Georgina Corrick. Gderrin (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you kindly, @Gderrin. Please feel free to add any info you have. Oronsay (talk) 19:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)