User talk:Original Acharya Guru Maharaj

February 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rakeshprasad. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 17:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rakeshprasad

Dear Sir, Donot publish fake information relating anyone then please. Cross verify otherwise your wikipedia is helping wrong trends to flourish and keep people in dark and away from truth and facts

Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 08:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rakeshprasad

Dear Lynx Rakeshprasad is not acharya. Nautam is not monk Ajendraprasadji is not removed....No one has powers rights authority to remove him Nrigendra Prasad ji is 9th generation of Lord SWAMINARAYAN no one else. Your write ups are totally wrong. Rakeshprasad has no connection with Vadtal SWAMINARAYAN Sect as Acharya... There is no existence of Dharmsabha No courts have removed Ajendraprasadji Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 08:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajendraprasadji

I have not added my personal comments or analysis but you remove all wrong information Have you checked facts before writing me?? Or have you checked Rakeshprasad information before uploading on your wikipedia? Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 08:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajendraprasadji

You stated you have neutral policy. Based upon your write up I would like to state that ...Declaring Rakeshprasad as 9th Acharya itself is worst kind of proof of breaking your own policy Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 08:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajendraprasadji

Lynx In fact your wikipedia has broken the policy of spreading correct information and facts to the public. Give me the proof from where you got Rakeshprasad as 9th Acharya and also who has uploaded this fake things on your wikipedia.... Why did your wikipedia believe blindly Why did not you contact Ajendraprasadji before uploading your fake write-up about his so called successor

Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 08:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajendraprasadji

1. High court has given no judgement against Ajendraprasadji... 2. Rakeshprasad has no connection with SWAMINARAYAN Sect as Acharya 3. Any kind of Dharmsabha has no existence 4. Nautam is not a monk but outcast expelled out from the Sect 5. Wikipedia has broken policy of spreading correct facts and its fooling the public Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 10:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shree Ajendraprasadji Maharaj (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shree Ajendraprasadji Maharaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shree Ajendraprasadji Maharaj, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Original Acharya Guru Maharaj! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajendraprasadji Maharaj Vadtal ACHARYAGURU

. High court has given no judgement against Ajendraprasadji... 2. Rakeshprasad has no connection with SWAMINARAYAN Sect as Acharya 3. Any kind of Dharmsabha has no existence 4. Nautam is not a monk but outcast expelled out from the Sect 5. Wikipedia has broken policy of spreading correct facts and its fooling the public Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Original Acharya Guru Maharaj

A tag has been placed on User:Original Acharya Guru Maharaj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VViking_TalkEdits 14:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shree Ajendraprasadji Maharaj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Shree Ajendraprasadji Maharaj, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kb.au (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (These words are the naked truth and absolute facts since foundation, inception and establishment of SWAMINARAYAN original sect, even legally socially and religiously. This will add knowledge of truth and facts amongst crores of devotees and followers ) --Original Acharya Guru Maharaj (talk) 14:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]