User talk:Oni Ookami Alfador

If you have come to respond to a comment I left on your talk page,STOP, go back, and respond there first. I am watching it.

Use the template {{talkback}} if you wish to notify me of a reply on your page.
I will respond to all conversations started here on this page.
If the matter is urgent I may also leave a note that I have responded on your talk page.

I reserve the right to ignore any replies that do not honor this system.

--Thank you, Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@

I have a tendency to disappear for long tracts of time, and often without warning. If you need or want my attention for some reason, it is advisable to use one of the alternative methods of communication on my user page.

DGAF

This user frequently does not give a fuck and as such may respond to some comments with apathy.

Archives

Archive 1:Through December 2007
Archive 2:Jan-Jun 2008

There's more to this than meets the eye. Please read it before jumping to any conclusions.

Notification of WP:WQA complaint

This is to formally notify you of a complaint I have filed at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#User:Oni Ookami Alfador. Please feel free to respond there. Thanks. --Art Smart (talk) 08:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I'm looking through the WQA complaint above. If you have a response, can you please make it at the page? It's generally preferrable (particularly for the record) for the subject (yourself) to respond directly prior to the issuing of Wikiquette Alerts or closing of complaints. Cheers - Ncmvocalist (talk) 16:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really feel the need to justify it with a response. It may not have been the wisest choice, and I will keep that in mind in the future, but I find it difficult to act any more civilly than I have to anyone who has immediately taken a condescending tone with me from the outset of our interactions (not to mention editing my talk page comments) and edit warring with other editors prior to my arrival. It is from this that I laid my observation of hypocricy and quite frankly I'm sticking to it. This seems to me as simply a content dispute being taken to a forum where it doesn't belong under the guise of some indignancy. If the editor involved really feels the need to grind his axe I don't mind, it doesn't interfere with my day-to-day, but I see no reason to get further involved just to see things (most likely) get inflamed further--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 18:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beganto

Are you an admin? If not, why not let an admin decide on my speedy nomination as we obviously have a difference of opinion? Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 14:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy process is for blatant issues. I don't feel it is blatant, and being an admin has nothing to do with it. There have been more issues with overzealous admins on speedies than I can count anyway. If you really care about it that much make an AFD.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 14:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shiba Inu

Hi! Sorry for my edit. I saw the cite error in the ref. section and just tried to fix it. Thanks for your fix. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And likewise, thank you. Refs are a bit messy and every once in a while I slip and break something while cleaning up.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 14:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done deal

As per your request, I re-reviewed the AfD in question and switched my vote. Job well done!

Ecoleetage (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Primetime

FYI, you were apparently in some dispute with user:Hello. I'm new here, but I'm sure I can help out., who left a message at User talk:Oni Ookami Alfador/Archive 2#Firefox talk page. That account was a sock of hardbanned Primetime (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Should you ever encounter an account that seems simialr please alert myself or another admin. He is a malicious vandal and is not permitted to edit here in any way. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 03:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, must have missed this. Well, thanks for notifying me. I'll certainly keep an eye out.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 14:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

user:Pedant17

After the umpteenth occasion when P17 has seen fit to rewrite the first sentence on nVidia in the active voice (along with the usual other half-dozen pages) and another round of "it's not banned so my actions are fine" on Talk:Dell, I'm considering a user conduct RfC on his continual slow edit warring to push the active voice in article ledes. He's been asked about it since 2006 to no apparent avail. Any thoughts? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on Assassin's Creed

Hi. You removed the fact tag attached to the teaser date on Assassin's Creed with (what seemed to me) an unnecessarily harsh comment and personal attack against me for adding it. The reason I added that tag was because we have no evidence of how long that teaser has been available (it could have been there since February for all we know). Another editor has looked around and found no other links to that page to justify when it was added. Therefore, I believe the date needs some justification, but the sentence reads better with the date there - hence the fact tag. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 08:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nicole PlasmaStick.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Nicole PlasmaStick.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nicole (DOA).gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Nicole (DOA).gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Etiquette

This comment to Shellac isn't acceptable etiquette and crosses over into WP:NPA territory. Other comments around the same time are similar in tone. I'm posting this in particular because it was a reasonable edit (apart from the comment) and I'm far enough away from the content that I don't think you can claim I'm merely biased because your deleting my edits. Not good practice though, and you seem to have a past history of such 8-( Andy Dingley (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Switchbladereduced.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Switchbladereduced.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Switchbladereduced.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Switchbladereduced.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Initial D characters and teams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Initial D characters and teams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Initial D characters and teams until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Initial D Extra Stage 1 DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Initial D Extra Stage 1 DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Oni Ookami Alfador. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Oni Ookami Alfador. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]