User talk:OneStoneDigital

April 2019

Hello, I'm Baden-Paul. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Adhiti Menon— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Baden-Paul (talk) 13:15, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Adhiti Menon, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adhiti Menon. Your edits are disruptive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adhiti Menon

A tag has been placed on Adhiti Menon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. OneStoneDigital (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Moved from User talk:Þjarkur

Hi, the concerned page that we are trying to delete, no longer exists in that name. It is an in house decision made by the person itself to delete her wikipedia page in that name. Also since it no longer meets Wikipedia guidelines for biographies, we are trying to delete the same. Kindly let us do our work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OneStoneDigital (talk • contribs) 10:59, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not being that notable is not a speedy deletion criteria. Regarding your "in house decision" and "let us do our work", how are you related to this person? Please read our conflict of interest guidelines and declare any COI on your user page. "No longer exists in that name", if she has changed her stage name you can go to WP:Requested moves. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And regarding your request for new page reviewer, it won't assist you in having this page changed. You can go to Talk:Adhiti Menon and discuss any new sources available on her. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you added {{connected contributor}} to the page but I've moved it to the talk page. Do you work for Menon or are you just connected to her? – Thjarkur (talk) 11:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Going through the edit history of the page might reveal you that it was me who had created the entire page. And now that since the concerned person no longer exists in the name and that the same name might cause her personal issues, we are taking it down. All the other reference websites and links to the concerned have been taken down on lieu of her being defamed in the same name. Wish you would understand the situation at which this is being done and also since this does not comply with the guidelines, request you to approve our deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OneStoneDigital (talk • contribs) 11:11, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's not true, the creator of this page is User:Southpow21. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, we are very well connected with Adhiti Menon since we manage her digital presence. This page should no longer exists as this is being used to defame her and causing threats to livelihood. All other associated handles have been taken down. It was we who had created the same page and we request to take it down. Since this also no longer complies with Wikipedia's guidelines for biographies, we request you to consider allowing us with the deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OneStoneDigital (talk • contribs) 11:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page contains no defamatory content and cites reliable sources. Please follow WP:COI and only suggest edits on the article's talk page using {{request edit}}. If you have proof of Menon wishing for this page to be removed, you can email the volunteer response team and that will be taken into consideration in a deletion discussion (not a speedy deletion). – Thjarkur (talk) 11:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop applying speedy deletion templates, it doesn't work like that. You may open up a deletion discussion and make a point that she does not pass notability guidelines, but it won't be speedy deleted. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

is an encyclopedia. It is not a advertising venue subject to the whims of outside agencies, like the one you represent. As you seem to have a rather deep conflict of interest, and a misunderstanding about the purpose of Wikipedia, please read WP:COI. Please also read and heed WP:PAID. As this username is a WP:CORPNAME, and as you seem to be here to promote the interests of your client, I will need to block this account. Please follow the instructions in the block notice that follows.-- Deep fried okra 11:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. -- Deep fried okra 12:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]