User talk:OnceaMetro

Hey!

Can you explain why you think Meyer_Malka‎ is notable and he warrants to have an article on Wikipedia. IMO, I do not find the article about him encyclopedic in nature and I would like to propose it for deletion. Nyashinski (talk) 07:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nyashinski,

I disagree with you. My efforts for the Meyer Malka page was because there were previous attempts and attacks on a fluff piece version. I follow the angel investor world as a part of my schooling. I found enough support to warrant a more factual representation of this notable person. If you "Google" him you will see for yourself. I feel there are far more less supported entries on Wikipedia that you could propose for deletion. The references and notability I was able to find does not put him in the deletion category. --OnceaMetro (talk) 15:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glenview Capital Management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Health Management Associates. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brian Taylor (financial services executive), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:CAPS

DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 02:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dr. Dre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philip Falcone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest guideline

Hello, OnceaMetro. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Amy Pascal, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Brianhe (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I used puffery for this entry or any other that I have worked on. And I certainly don't know any of these people in the article. A couple of my most recent edits were for Bill Gates and Paul Allen. If I knew them I wouldn't be having this conversation especially if they gave me compensation.--OnceaMetro (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for paid advocacy and violating the Terms of Use

Per Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-04-22/Special report, your editing privileges have been revoked. In order for any unblock request to be considered, you must publicly disclose all clients that have paid you to edit Wikipedia. MER-C 01:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed above. I do have a client list but it is for customers who come into my store who are not notable enough to be on Wikipedia. And to touch back on the article, one of the examples is Steve Ross of Time Warner. He has been dead for over 30 years so I would have a hard time collecting on that one. The categories I edit on all have the same editors that I come across time and time again.--OnceaMetro (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 22:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new thread opened today. — Brianhe (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of JAT Capital Management

The article JAT Capital Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only serves as advertising; no WP:NCORP here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meyer Malka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meyer Malka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meyer Malka (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]