User talk:On 15
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Eurovision Song Contest 2010. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Camaron · Christopher · talk 19:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
I reverted you because Austria hasn't been active in Eurovision since 2007. The list of active countries is for countries that are active, i.e. have participated in 2010. TFOWRidle vapourings 14:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Crikey, last message was from me, saying much the same as I'm about to say now: I reverted your edit. You added a country that has not yet participated. It may participate next time (and it may not - the source everyone is going mad over is speculative). Until it participates it is not an active participant. TFOWR 15:46, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Please stop adding gossips to pages
[edit]Tarkan is NOT an announced participant for Eurovision 2011, Turkey only decides in January. He is not even an official applicant and he denied such rumours several times during his career, saying he would never participate in Eurovision. Please stop adding unsources gossips. --小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 11:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- ama gidecegi hic de belli degil ya. Dedikodu koyuyorsun! Kim dedi ki tarkan gidecek? Tarkan mi dedi? TRT mi dedi. Hayir. O zaman koymasana iste. Burasi ansikloopedidir, forum degil. --小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 10:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- baktim. TRT kimin gidecegini Ocak'ta söyleyecek. http://www.eurovision.tv/page/news?id=22403&_t=Turkey+picks+in+January TRT web sitesinde de detay yok. Yani biraksana artik bu sakayi. Hic de komik degilsin. --小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 10:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
January 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm Wesley Mouse. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Eurovision Song Contest 2013 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Citations are vital to any article on Wikipedia, as they provide verification to content. Wesley♦Mouse 10:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Eurovision Song Contest 2014 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. . Please see the discussion taking place at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2014#Albania, before continuing to engage in edit warring with other Wikipedians. Wesley♦Mouse 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm Pickette. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Malta in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pickette (talk) 11:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm Lightsout. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Beautiful (Jessica Mauboy album) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lightsout (talk) 22:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Lena Stamenković
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Lena Stamenković requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.esc-plus.com/lena-stamenkovic-to-represent-serbia-at-junior-eurovision-with-lenina-pesma/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bharatiya29 (talk) 08:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, On 15. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, On 15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, On 15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)