User talk:Ominictionary

== Welcome! ==i did not change the birth place of Thatcher you are wrong

Hello, Ominictionary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 09:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Thank u JarrahTree 09:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC) for showing such helpful behaviour toward me. You give me a very helpful information about wikipedia. If I need any kind of help I will surely remember you. Thanks again.Ominictionary (talk)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ominictionary, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to In Time of Peril has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ Thank u for helping me Doug Weller talk 16:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC). Actually I don't find any other source in internet thus I compleely copy it from other source. But now I am going rewriting the article please check it and please inform me if I make any mistake.(Ominictionary)[reply]

October 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sanjeeda Sheikh has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sanjeeda Sheikh was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.bollywoodlife.com/news-gossip/sanjeeda-sheikh-and-not-tina-dutta-bags-the-lead-role-in-sangharsh-with-jasmine-bhasin-and-siddharth-shukla/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, great to have your aboard. I hope you will not let the aggressive comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barron Trump (2nd nomination) deter you from editing, people are a little emotional in the wake of last week's election. Indeed, I hope you will stick around, we need more good editors on every topic. Cheers! E.M.Gregory (talk)

Hello, User1937, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hello E.M.Gregory (talk) thanks for voicing your opinion. But I can not understand when I comment aggressively in my view I was always polite in every discussion. I wish you will help me by replying. Ominictionary (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ominictionary: Oh, dear. I didn't mean it that way at all. I'm so terribly sorry that I was unclear. That AFD discussion has a number of editors who have let their emotional respons over last week's election lead them to being unusually rude, aggressive and dismissive of other editors opinions. It also has an unusually large number of editors who are new to Wikipedia or new to AFD discussions, I took or possibly mistook) you for a new or newish editor when I wrote to a handful of new editors on that page because I like ot make new editors welcome at Wikipedia, and I was afraid that the tone of that discussion might discourage newer editors from continuing to edit.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@It's okayE.M.Gregory (talk) I did not felt bad for your word I was just thinking about my mistake. Thanks for welcoming me and helping me. Ominictionary (talk) 19:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Neerja page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sanjeeda Sheikh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ek Hasina Thi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Margaret Thatcher does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Nevé –selbert 21:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nomination of Democracy (Fiction)

Hello, I noticed you were having some trouble with nominating the article Democracy (Fiction) for deletion. I have fixed the nomination and added the deletion discussion to the daily log; please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy (Fiction). Because the discussion was never added to the log it's possible that the reviewing admins will consider today (10 June) as the date the discussion was opened, but that's not my call. Thanks, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 23:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Expired reference?

Your edit summary for this edit on Benazir Bhutto does not make clear your rationale for removing the reference. If by "expired reference" you meant that the original url was not working (a dead link), that is not a reason to remove a citation. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. In this case there is a working archived copy of the original url. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ominictionary. You have new messages at Talk:Asif Ali Zardari.
Message added 04:06, 8 August 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 04:06, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Mujib article

Hi, I left a comment again. Thanks. Ficusindica (talk) 19:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I left a comment adain. Thanks. Ficusindica (talk) 13:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another answer. Ficusindica (talk) 15:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ominictionary. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Mujib article

Hi, Sheikh Mujib has two further titles: "Jatir Jonok" and "Jatir Pita." Will you be able to put those in? Thanks. Ficusindica (talk) 14:55, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ficusindica, I appretiate your effort toward the article. Yes, I can add that title but I think it could affect on article's neutrality. Because most of the time this title have been used Awami league politian. Like only awami league politian address Mrs Mujib as Bangamata. As far as I know, In Bangladesh, Bengali and English newspaper often called her only Bangabandhu. What do you think??? Ominictionary (talk) 15:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of bangamata actually. But I don't think Jatir Pita and Jatir Jonok are biased. They are used a lot of times. I think that just because they are used, they should be noted, otherwise the article will be less informative. We could say " He is popularly known as Bangabandhu" and is sometimes also referred to as "Jatir Jonok" or "Jatir Pita." Ficusindica (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Ficusindica, as you are so confident then I will add.Ominictionary (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you think we need more opinion on this inclusion? Also, you don't think we should use both of the titles ie. "Pita" and "Janak," but used equally often. Thanks. Ficusindica (talk) 20:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hello, Ficusindica as both of the word mean the same thing so I don't think its necessary to use both. One is enough. Both word with same meaning look quite awkward in a sentence. Ominictionary (talk) 20:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We can try as best as we can to make it clear that both mean the same thing, but we'll be doing injustice to informativeness an the other word if we don't note it. Ficusindica (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if you wish yo do it on the lead section with the information that both are same. But don't add it on the honourific title. It was looking quite awkward and as I have nominate the article for good article, so, the article should look need and clean. So, plz be carefil. Bests Ominictionary (talk) 20:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ficusindica, I added the word Jatir Pita on lead section. I hope now its okay. Ominictionary (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's better. I actually think bias works on the notions that a favorite article is ready for good article or not. I think the best judgment of it should be whether it is actually informative from an unbiased perspective. That being said, in an English article, in the honorific titles section, the titles matter little if we don't add the English translation. What do you think? Thanks. Ficusindica (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree about tranlation. But plz let Jatir Pita go now. Adding Jatir pita was quite unclear if as a native I don't understand. What would foreign people do. Ominictionary (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a proponent of informativeness, so I try to put in as much information as possible. What do you say to "Thus, he is regarded Jatir Janak or Jatir Pita (Jatir Jônok or Jatir Jônok, both meaning Father of the Nation) of Bangladesh."? Ficusindica (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ficusindica, your pronouciation is wrong. But idea is okay. But not in honourific title plz. It's okay in lead section. Ominictionary (talk) 21:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the honorific titles section, initially, I thought of having one line for each honorific title. So it will be:

Bangabandhu (বঙ্গবন্ধু "Friend of Bengal")

Jatir Janak/Pita (জাতির জনক/পিতা "Father of the Nation")

Why do you think it's unclear, other than the fact that the second line is a bit too long?

Thanks. Ficusindica (talk) 21:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ficusindica, trust me, both are the same thing and not necessary twice time and honorific title doesn't need translation. Check Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Mahatma Gandhi's article and I also think adding same think twice could violate WP:CLEANUP policy. Bests Ominictionary (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove "Jatir Pita"? Ficusindica (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ficusindica, I had mentioned the reason in edit summary, the pronounciation was not correct. Ominictionary (talk)

What do you think the correct pronunciation will be? I think the romanization scheme we use for phonetic transcription in Wikipedia is a system used in Wikipedia only, termed "Wiki" [1]. Someone had since removed it from the article through. Ficusindica (talk) 14:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@I don't know Ficusindica how to write pronouciation either if I knew I must correct it till now. But I am quite sure that was not the correct process, you have written it how we type messege you can check in history the previous version, I think an expert in needed here. Ominictionary (talk) 15:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let's used the Wikipedia Phonetic Romanization scheme [2]. Using this system, we just write how we pounce, "Jatir Pita" is just "Jatir Pita." Ficusindica (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@No, this is not the way not the way to write pronounciation. We have to use IPA or International Phonetic Alphabet and plz I am tired discussing same thing. Plz, discuss it on article's talk page. Maybe you can get some solution there. But I am sure that this is not the correct form. Ominictionary (talk) 16:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We never use IPA. Take a look at the phonetic transcription that is given for Sheikh Mujuibur Rahman or take a look at the articles on Bangladesh, Prime Minister or the Jatiya Sangsad. Or else, I'll just put it there until someone fixes and not deletes it. It has always been advised to include information and not tangled with technicalities, which is for other people to fix. Ficusindica (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ Ficusindica I have checked that and I am still saying that this is not the right way. Despite knowing about this, putting this information could be wrong and I am sure that even you can't say that you know how to write it properly and if you still do this then I have to remove it and issue a discussion on talk page of the article. As a wikipedian it is our duty to give correct and verified information not to do what we think as correct but as a well-wisher, I would suggest you issuing a talk page discussion on the article's page. Bests Ominictionary (talk) 21:26, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aseefa Bhutto Zardari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aseefa Bhutto Zardari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aseefa Bhutto Zardari (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 07:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tahmima Anam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover picture of Home Fire.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sheikh Mujibur Rahman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 02:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman

The article Sheikh Mujibur Rahman you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sheikh Mujibur Rahman for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 03:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ominictionary. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Regina Coat of Arms.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of Regina Coat of Arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Viqarunnisa Noon School and College.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Viqarunnisa Noon School and College.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anushay Hossain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anushay Hossain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anushay Hossain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 19:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]