User talk:Omer123hussain/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Edit warring at India

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 18:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Battle of Hyderabad (1709) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Hyderabad (1709), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Raja Rambha Rao Bahadur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raja Rambha Rao Bahadur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Deccani mushaira moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Deccani mushaira, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Raja Rambha Rao Bahadur

Hello, Omer123hussain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raja Rambha Rao Bahadur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Hyderabad (1709)

Hello, Omer123hussain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Hyderabad (1709), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

"Dar ul Iftah" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dar ul Iftah and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 14#Dar ul Iftah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 11:48, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Expanded and restored the article. Omer123hussain (talk) 12:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

We are not discussing Jamiat Ul Mominat article. Anyways, thanks for the good work! ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 15:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

:) it was in my bucket list to expand Jamiat Ul Mominat, thanks. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 12:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Need to close this

Hi! I guess it's time that you close Wikipedia:Peer review/Mah Laqa Bai/archive1 properly. It mentions that the discussion is closed, but the entry still appears in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Article alerts. Thanks!--Dwaipayan (talk) 00:39, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello; Can you guide me to close or direct me the method to close it properly, because I tried to do it but confused. :) Omer123hussain (talk) 08:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't know either. May be Tito Dutta (talk · contribs) can help?--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:09, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Dwaipayanc, No, The PR was still open on the talk page. I've tried to close this through a tool. Wait for AAlertBot to update Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Article alerts. Thanks, ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 13:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks TheAafi. --Dwaipayan (talk) 00:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Deccani mushaira

Hello, Omer123hussain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deccani mushaira".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of In the Bazaars of Hyderabad

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article In the Bazaars of Hyderabad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, Thanks a lot, happy reviewing, I will coordinate for any corrections. :) Omer123hussain (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Golconda diamonds

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Golconda diamonds you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nolabob -- Nolabob (talk) 21:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, let's begin. :)

Omer123hussain (talk) 21:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Golconda diamonds article

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your diligence on this interesting subject Nolabob (talk) 00:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Golconda diamonds

The article Golconda diamonds you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Golconda diamonds for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nolabob -- Nolabob (talk) 01:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For getting Golconda diamonds to Good Article status. Dwaipayan (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, it means a tons of motivation to receive a barnstar from you. Omer123hussain (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of In the Bazaars of Hyderabad

The article In the Bazaars of Hyderabad you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:In the Bazaars of Hyderabad for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

The Most Comfortable Chair (talk · contribs) Thanks for your review, I will certainly correct and improve as per recommendations very soon. Re-nomination will take much more time, rather can we correct these errors and continue this review. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 05:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Memorial

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Memorial you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Memorial

The article Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Memorial you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Memorial for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golconda diamonds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golconda diamonds, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Louis IV and Louis III.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Controversies of Golconda Diamonds

The article Controversies of Golconda Diamonds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INDISCRIMNATE grouping, and not really "controversies". Diamonds get stolen, but that they are also Golconda diamonds is not really relevant (no one sets out to specifically steal Golconda diamonds and not other ones, do they?)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

I will expand this page, there are plenty of controversies, heist and scandles related to this subject, that we cannot keep in its main article Golconda Diamonds, it will disbalance the stability of article Golconda Diamonds. As you may see I am still in the process of expanding the article. I believe it is a separate topic which will need further more expansion. Omer123hussain (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Crimes surrounding Golconda Diamonds for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crimes surrounding Golconda Diamonds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crimes surrounding Golconda Diamonds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Us/we

Hi Omer123hussain. On a few occasions on talk pages, you have referred to yourself as "us" or "we". Do more than one person use this account? I wonder especially because the level of technical vocabulary you use in your writing varies widely. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Hello Vanamonde, thanks for pointing that out, don't worry, it's due to my professional/work habits it comes out that way, and technical vocabulary depends on the place from where I am writing/using WP like workplace/traveling/home. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 11:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Hyderabad (1709) (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alexandermcnabb was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Hyderabad (1709) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Omer123hussain! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Golconda diamonds for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Golconda diamonds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Golconda diamonds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grorp (talk) 03:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring at Hyderabad

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hyderabad. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board

The article Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Procedural tagging: IP 103.251.217.159 placed invalid CSD tag stating "notability,lack of source"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Restored to correct name, as after bifurcation name of the department is changed. Regards :) Omer123hussain (talk) 08:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malik-E-Maidan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hachette.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hyderabad. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Already discussed on article talk page its not fair to remove an entire secrion which is linked and well cited. Omer123hussain (talk) 11:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 14:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Which edit you are talking about, can you please cite it. Omer123hussain (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Quotation at Talk:Hyderabad

Hi. I don't understand why you refuse to provide quotations despite asked by 3 editors (@DrKay, @Toddy1 who engaged in content discussion, later by me who was uninvolved). I'm trying to make another attempt as to understand what's going on and if I'm missing something. Could you explain please? — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 15:53, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, yes you are right you don't understand, that's why you are make false accusation against me. i challenge you to show/prove any instance wherein i mentioned; "i will not provide quotation"?

Background

The section where i placed citation was already cited, but i added an additional comprehensive citation, but editor @Toddy1 deleted it with in 1.5 hrs-and gave the reason for deletion is to provide the quotation.[1]

enquiry

When i enquired the reason to delete, the editor mentioned the link is not accessible in there region.

So my question is if you do not find a quotation or if the link is not accessible in your region, are we allowed to delete the citation without intimation or discussion.

This discussion was going on between us, you and @DrKay approached, meanwhile @DrKay deleted the content with the reason; the old citation which were existing before my edit also do not verify the content, So i find the active link and restored the section. but again @DrKay placed vf tags saying some more text need to be cited as it is not available in citation. But @Toddy1 intervened by deleting the entire section. Though the topic was still under discussion on article talk page.

So my enquiry with you and all involved editors who are blindly supporting the destructive actions of @Toddy1 are, Is it not overzealous deletion, personal attack or bullying done by @Toddy1,

• If links are not accessible, is it okay to delete the entire section/edits without discussion, as @Toddy1 is proving and you are supporting it.[2]
• Does every source should contain quotation, if yes, then if quotation is not available the section should be deleted, even if its being discussed on talk page.[3]

Omer123hussain (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Anthem Kolkata for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthem Kolkata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthem Kolkata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PepperBeast (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha

Hello! Your submission of Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

I resolved those issues and rewrote the hook. :) Omer123hussain (talk) 05:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Article is still too short. Please expand it further. I've posted details to the nomination page. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Golconda diamonds

Hi there. I have reverted your change in ratings at this page. It is not possible to achieve A-class without review by at least two uninvolved editors. Please see Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria for more detail. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the honour. Omer123hussain (talk) 05:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Discussion at ANI.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Omer123hussain:_persistent_sourcing_issues. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Lourdes 05:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Recent block

Hi Omer123hussain. I've been looking into your recent block, and I'm wondering if there is a way we can move forward and lift it. Are you open to discussing what we can do moving into the future? - Bilby (talk) 02:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha

Hello! Your submission of Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Done, thanks and appricate your support. Omer123hussain (talk) 13:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Omer123hussain, please stop by the nomination; issues have been raised that need to be addressed. I realize you are currently blocked in article space, but you can continue answering questions on this DYK nomination, if you wish to continue pursuing it. Best of luck. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Golconda diamonds

Hi Omer, I'll be working on the copy-edit only; I'm not planning to do any fact-checking so any inaccuracies will probably remain in the article. You can leave me messages on my talk or here if you wish. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

I've now finished my copy-edit; despite what I said above, I did check a few sources where I felt I needed confirmation of what the article said. In several cases, I found the listed sources do not support some or any of the cited content; i have marked these texts with {{not in source}} templates, which can be removed once the correct citation has been found or the affected text is removed. My rationales are in my edit summaries. These problems must be fixed before the article is nominated for FA status. I hope you manage to get your block lifted one day. Good luck and Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Golconda diamonds mining and trading

An article that you have been involved in editing—Golconda diamonds mining and trading—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Ahendra (talk) 13:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aronitz (talk) 11:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Islamic heritage of Hyderabad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic heritage of Hyderabad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic heritage of Hyderabad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)