User talk:OliviaWolfie/Archive 1

Archive 1

Richard Braine's name

Hi OliviaZoe0

I've noticed that you removed my edit to UKIP leader Richard Braine's article in which I added his full name, Richard William Maguire Braine, with your reason being that the name could be incorrect as you couldn't find any references to it online.

The page seems to have been locked to new editors, so I've provided some online references to Braine's full name below:

https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/pressrelease/pressreleasePage.aspx?id=6985

https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/atoms/files/Notice%20of%20Election%20Agents%27%20Names%20and%20Offices%20%E2%80%93%20Chelsea%20Riverside%20Ward_0.pdf

https://www.enfieldindependent.co.uk/news/17659369.voters-head-to-the-polls-on-european-parliament-election-day/

https://www.westminster.gov.uk/sites/default/files/eu_parl_list_of_persons_and_parties_nominated_and_notice_of_poll.pdf

http://www.checkcompany.co.uk/director/2551306/MR-RICHARD-WILLIAM-MAGUIRE-BRAINE

Thanks! PlatinumClipper96 (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

User:PlatinumClipper96 I've restored the full name, with the Westminster Council link as the source (as it ties in with the statement in the article that Mr Braine was second on the UKIP party list in that election). Note that you can yourself request edits to protected pages by adding {{edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with the wording of the proposed change. If it's properly sourced, all the better! Cheers. --kingboyk (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Looks like it's already been handled, so I guess this reply is kinda useless. But your edit ended up being included in a stream of vandalism, so when I couldn't verify it, I ended up reverting that specific change after another mismatch on the school (according to the website anyway). Now that I've mentioned vandalism, I'm not saying your edits were vandalism - it was just bad timing I guess. Without being able to verify it, I just decided it would be easiest to undo that. The website didn't include the middle names either. I don't live in the UK, so I honestly had no idea where to look specifically. Thanks for the links though, and sorry for the rollback. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️ (She/her) (talk) 10:25, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks kingboyk and OliviaZoe0! PlatinumClipper96 (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Stay awesome. jennasloan (talk) 10:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Note

I'm sorry that you experienced such trolling on your talk page. That is not acceptable behaviour and I have reported them to WP:ANV. I hope the rest of your day is better. The first time I dealt with something like that felt pretty awful, so if you ever want to reach out to someone, I'm here for you. Clovermoss (talk) 21:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks ^^ FWIW, it ain't the first time. There's been some rounds in the past. One of the IPs is a returning one. They've been here before (judging by the IP geolocation and the recurring pattern in the messages - not a guarantee it's the same person obviously, but it makes sense). Some of the revisions got entirely deleted too. Thanks for reporting it by the way. I'm still not entirely sure when things like these are supposed to be reported. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️ (She/her) (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Well, after my report the IP address was rangeblocked for a week so it shouldn't happen again. If they come back after the block, my suggestion would be to make another report at WP:ANV since harassment is fairly serious. However, that might not be the best place for it. I don't have a lot experience when it comes to stuff like this, so I'll ping Bishonen to see if they have any advice. Clovermoss (talk) 21:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Come directly to me, please. Are you talking about 2a02:908:183:39d::/64, Clovermoss? I did block that range for a week, but I didn't see them as having anything to do with Olivia. Surely that was Kiwi11lad? Anyway, I've indeffed Kiwi11lad and also blocked the IP 75.167.146.68, which Kiwi11lad used after the block to make threats. It's unpleasant, but there's nothing they can do to you, you know, even if they try, rather pathetically, to sound scary. Bishonen | talk 21:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC).

PS. No, I see it was 2a02:908:183:39d::/64 and Kiwi11lad. Charming. Bishonen | talk 21:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC).

@Bishonen: Also this. Posted yesterday, geolocation adds up with my recollection of the earlier ones (I vaguely remember two positions close to each other). I'm also pretty sure some of this has escalated off-site (matching pattern with one of the incidents, but I'm not sure how it all connects yet), but I've dealt with that separately. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️ (She/her) (talk) 22:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that. Please let me know if you want your userpages semiprotected. Perhaps it's better not to dignify it with so much attention, though. Bishonen | talk 22:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC).

Probably. The pages don't need protection for now. This might be the last we see for now anyway, and it does risk blocking real conversations. We'll see if it's needed later I guess. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️ (She/her) (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Bishonen: I take that back. Could you protect the pages? -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️ (She/her) (talk) 23:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I see ST47 already protected this talkpage for a couple of weeks, and the other IPv6 range has also been blocked. I'm blocking 213.205.241.0/24, and protecting your userpage. Bishonen | talk 00:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC).

Rollback granted

Hi OliviaZoe0. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! kingboyk (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! I noticed that on your revert for CHERUB you reverted an edit. As this edit wasn’t clear cut vandalism, I suggest using an edit summary to explain why you reverted it. Thanks! — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 21:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Berrely: It's the default message generated by Twinkle when clicking the shiny red "vandalism" button. Not much I can do to change it. That being said, I fail to see how you classify an edit deleting actual content and inserting "pus" after a bunch of newlines in a (previously) sensible block of text as constructive. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️ (She/her) (talk) 22:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

I didn't consider that edit constructive, but generally, unless an edit is extremely obvious vandalism, it would be better to use a more specific edit summary, such as "unexplained content removal". The added content was a table and could've been in good faith, so it is better to say why the edit was reverted. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 09:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Aneo

Hello, OliviaWolfie,

Thank you for creating Aneo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Only one of the sources cited is secondary, the others point to the company's own website (and don't even work). For notability per WP:GNG, we need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Aneo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aneo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and more citations to support the information. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Aneo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aneo. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aneo (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aneo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aneo

Hello, OliviaWolfie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aneo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)