User talk:OliverBel

November 2013

Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wankel engine ‎ because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Andy Dingley (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Grime for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Grime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Grime until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:46, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm WadeSimMiser. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Zeno of Elea, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WadeSimMiser 20:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This constitutes a personal attack. You are permitted to challenge admin actions, but you resorted to hyperbole and an accusation of fascism (ironic on the talk page of a holocaust denier). Guy (Help!) 13:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 13:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

per [1] and WP:POINT. Guy (Help!) 13:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing, and especially further WP:POINT violations: [2], [3]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 23:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Irving. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You knew you'd be reverted, you've tried this before. Doug Weller talk 05:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 15:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 17:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you indefinitely for tendentious and disruptive editing. Guy (Help!) 17:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]