User talk:Olaf404

This is Olaf404's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transformer-based language models (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praseodymium-141 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Transformer-based language models and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹ Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 13:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the guidance Olaf404 (talk) 03:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Olaf404! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ¹⁴¹ Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 13:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your guidance Olaf404 (talk) 04:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to publish a page for the company I work. I have also disclosed that I am a paid editor. Could you please give some guidance on how to write about a company without making it look like an advertisement. Also, I'm learning about Wikipedia, so please consider and give me some time. Please do not block me from editing. Olaf404 (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Olaf404

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Olaf404 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FinSurge (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FinSurge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to add adequate references Olaf404 (talk) 09:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:FinSurge

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:FinSurge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 11:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to write about my workplace. Also, I have disclosed that I'm a paid editor in my user page. Could you please give some guidance to publish Wikipedia page about my workplace. Is writing about a company itself is unambiguous advertisement or is there any way I can correct it?

Also, I can see about many companies in Wikipedia. Why can't I publish this? Could you also please tell which part makes this content unambiguous advertisement. Olaf404 (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Transformer-based language models

Hello, Olaf404. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Transformer-based language models, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FinSurge moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to FinSurge. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FinSurge (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FinSurge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FinSurge (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Why did you re-submit with zero improvement or changes?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FinSurge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Olaf404. I am just replying to this as you have re-submitted the draft again with no improvement.

Companies must pass our WP:NORG notability criteria in order to merit a Wikipedia article. You have not demonstrated notability. You have also written the draft in a promotional way - we don't care what the company states about itself in press releases or interviews, we care about what independent third party reliable sources have to say.

The existence of other articles has no bearing on if this draft should be accepted: we judge each article independently. Unfortunately Wikipedia has many tens of thousands of poor quality articles, and we certainly don't want to add more.

If you have been asked by your supervisor to write this article, please read WP:BOSS. Qcne (talk) 10:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand. Could you please guide me in correcting it? Olaf404 (talk) 10:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to rewrite but still couldn't make it in a neutral sense as it is for a company. Olaf404 (talk) 10:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should be finding independent, secondary, reliable sources (such as newspapers, magazines, not press releases) that discusses the company in detail and then summarise or paraphrase those sources in your own words.

The reasons why it reads like an advert are as follows:

FinSurge is a software company that has been delivering Fintech solutions to the Treasury Global Markets & Banking Ecosystems since 2017 - See WP:SOLUTIONS.
FinSurge has been doing Murex. software consultation, Software Development & Murex software implementations for investment and wholesale banks. - this is just an advert for it's services.
FinSurge is also recognized as the leading global consultancy for innovative financial software development for consumer banking - who says it is recognised as a leading global consultancy? This must be stated in an independent, secondary, reliable source.
FinSurge began its IT operations with a team of 15 employees. FinSurge has continued to expand its workforce and it currently has over 270 employees. - Unsourced.
With the continuous growth, FinSurge entered a new level of business partnership with Murex company - this is just marketing-speak and is inappropriate.
With 27 years of business experience, FinSurge has been providing solutions for trading, risk management, and processing for banks, and other financial institutions# - WP:SOLUTIONS again.
The company's growth, innovations, and its impact on the FinTech landscape - what innovations, what impact? These must be described in independent, secondary, reliable sources.
It has shown interest in many community and philanthropic activities - this is irrelevant.

As you can see then, almost nothing in the draft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I would honestly give up on this draft, it does not seem like the company is notable enough for inclusion on our project. Qcne (talk) 11:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You! Will try to find reliable source and come up with better draft Olaf404 (talk) 11:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FinSurge

Hello, Olaf404. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FinSurge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]