User talk:Okulov99

Welcome!

Hi! Welcome to the English Wikipedia! Fun and Interesting Articles Userpage guidelines Load a random article! Userbox directory Join a WikiProject Are you a Wikipediholic? The top editors The motto of the day Some really bad ideas..... The Department of Fun! Wikisongs!! Some new article ideas Some very odd articles..... List of the newest users Barnstars! List of user rewards List of pages most vandalized Very frequently asked questions Jimmy Wales, owner of Wikipedia The reward board (earn $$$) Get articles to edit from SuggestBot Find out how many edits you have! Hello, Okulov99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for joining. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:   Introduction  5    The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Keep cool   Share your knowledge   Get adopted   Neutral point of view And here are several pages on what to avoid: How to avoid Copyright infringement How to not spam Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this If you would like to view more useful links, visit this page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might be interested in the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your editing; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome!

•Malinaccier Public• ^T/C 13:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ISBN 5020000485

Hello Okulov99,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged [[ISBN 5020000485]] for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 15:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of General Physics Institute

Hello Okulov99,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged General Physics Institute for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 15:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

i am so sorry to inform you that you deleted the WHOLE source code of my article (about 3 kb of compiled text).

Unfortunately i did NOT made reserve copy of this article.

As a result in my age, 58 years old, i must seat again near computer

and suffer from headaches to recover article about myself.

Noteworthy, the article might be easily blocked without complete deletion.

But the source code belongs to author, indeed. It is lost

for me forever. But this text belongs now to third parties.

Sorry.

This source had been deleted just for inclusion

of

1) ACADEMIC article from www.loc.gov

2) and name of academic institute: namely General Physics Institute

So i did nothing wrong. These lines might be excluded

without destruction of the whole article.

Sorry.

i am so sorry, but your move seems to be quite unfriendly.

i did not included any improper content in this code indeed.

And this article had been closed from viewing for wikipedia audience on November 10. i expected to squeeze the article as i usually do with scientific article.

So you deleted the info on my published works and my career i would like to share with professional community.

i had intention to edit this draft, but i cannot edit it

further, the three days of my life were spent in vain.

i am 58 years old already and it is not easy to maintain

working conditions in this age.

It is a pity and as far as i concern deletion was made in irreversible way.

So i cannot edit this uncompleted page forever.

With all my respect to Wikipedia creators and personnel i will not contribute to Wikipedia in future.

Because i feel heavy discomfort of your action.

So if you disregard me to such extent, i assume that you may also try delete my scientific articles from www.arxiv.org.

Nevertheless i wish you a good health and recommend you to read a printed books on basics of Christian morale.

Best wishes to you and your family,

Alexey Okulov,

Ph.D in Physics and Math,

who worked since 1979 as research physicist

and scientific programmer in

1) Lebedev Physics Institute

and

2)General Physics Institute

of Russian academy of Sciences.

File:Helical trap Okulov.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Helical trap Okulov.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:34, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Pointing Oam wiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pointing Oam wiki.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Vortex-antivortex pairs jpg.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Vortex-antivortex pairs jpg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. sst✈^discuss 08:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Speckle vortex pairs Ropes jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Speckle vortex pairs Ropes jpg.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Helix magnetic 2015 jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Helix magnetic 2015 jpg.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Self focus fast Kelly111.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Self focus fast Kelly111.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:BEC loaded in double helix trap22.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BEC loaded in double helix trap22.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:BEC loaded in double helix trap wikipedia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BEC loaded in double helix trap wikipedia.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:BEC loaded in double helix trap wiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BEC loaded in double helix trap wiki.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Pointing Oam wiki okulov.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pointing Oam wiki okulov.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Image descriptions

Hi, much appreciated if you could add appropriate captions to these, so that those of us that aren't technically minded can approriately assess them for Commons.

• File:Helical_trap_Okulov.jpg
• File:Michelson Okulov curve.jpg
• File:Michelson Okulov.jpg.jpg

It will also aid those trying to understand the research concerned. Thanks

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Helical trap Okulov.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Helical trap Okulov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Okulov99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Take part in a survey

Hi Okulov99

We're working to measure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms. We want to ask you some questions about how you value being able to edit Wikipedia.

Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.

As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from the Wikipedia store (e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.

Click here to access the survey: http://ucla.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bI9nxWdVDoNZZKR

Thanks

Avi

Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Okulov99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Logistic map, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexey Okulov has been accepted

Alexey Okulov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexey_Okulov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexey_Okulov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexey_Okulov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ruslik_Zero 20:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexey Okulov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexey Okulov, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexey Okulov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Ruslik_Zero 20:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) is NOT expert in Physics. Okulov99 (talk) 10:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

User Ruslik_Zero nominated for deletion 20:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) on the article which satifies Criterion 1 for notability:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#C1

Criterion 1

can also be satisfied if the person has pioneered or developed a significant new concept,

technique or idea, made a significant discovery or solved a major problem in their academic discipline.

Have at least one significantly new concept:

"Michelson interferometer with phase-conjugating mirrors" ,

published in especially prestigious and selective academic journal JETP

(in 1980 JETP was a one of the most prestigious and selective journals in Physics).

Citation metrics confirm this partially.

In this case it is necessary to explicitly demonstrate, by a substantial number of references to academic publications of researchers other than the person in question, that this contribution is indeed widely considered to be significant and is

widely attributed to the person in question.

publications in especially prestigious and selective academic journals;

The only professional in Physics wiki User who participated in discussion was Ldm1954

Delete, as per above. No indication that he is close to any of the notability criteria. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

By position and activities Ldm1954 is Professor in Physics. But Ldm1954 does not see any notability in "Michelson interferometer with phase-conjugation" and subsequent realizations with optical vortices and Bose-Einstein condensates. It's a pity.Sorry. i apologies for inconviniences inflicted by my works to Professor Ldm1954.

The other Users were unprofessionals:

User: Bearian (school teacher with undefined past ) Delete. I don't see how any of his research was anything other than secondary. Bearian (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

User X (User:Xoak who denies "dogmatism" and who "had been a member of Women in Red" ):

Delete Does not meet WP:NPROF as yet. X (talk) 22:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Okulov99 (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:David Eppstein can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Users do NOT have to be subject experts to comment on articles for deletion, please stop harassing other editors. Theroadislong (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Sir, thank you very much for your opinion.

Kindly please, take into account. i brought apologies to Prof. David Eppstein

concerning mentioning his age. Kindly please take into account that my apologies

were extensive and i wrote several sentences with excuses.

Noteworthy i refined my question in a hopefully correct form:

indeed, the age of Wikipedia , filled by high quality content due to efforts of

millions of Users, is about 20 years. Hence if a some

person made 200 000 decisions on wikipedia content this means that

a some person did about 10 000 decisions yearly and about 30 decisions

on wiki content daily. Consequently some of these decisions may suffer

from lightweightness.

As a result of lightweight decisions a useful content may be lost or else this useful content may appear on pages created by another users. The probability that deleted content may appear on another pages in a form convinient to another users is nonzero. What's wrong in this polite argument?

i insist on apparent fact. The well visible flaw in a one particular

deletion that had been performed within one week, since April 24 till May 2.

The probability is error is high, because the only

appropriate expert ldm1954 confirmed deletion.

i insist on the fact that deleted page descripts the

several NOTABLE concepts developed in research where a given

researcher took part.

i mentioned the apparent fact that user Ruslik_zero has edited

articles in observational planetology. This person who nominated

a given article for deletion is NOT an expert in physics, in particular in

quantum optics and cond-mat. Sorry, it is a well visible fact. Okulov99 (talk) 17:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

This largely makes very little sense so it's difficult to respond, but again editors do NOT have to be subject experts to decide whether a topic is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Theroadislong (talk) 17:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for obvious info. i stress the point that deletion of pages may result in a lost of useful content or else to transfer the useful content to another pages for the profit of another users. Okulov99 (talk) 06:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

You are free to publish the content elsewhere, it can be emailed to you if you request that from the deleting admin. Theroadislong (talk) 07:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, i have a habit keep my own sources codes in html, tex, fortran safely. Cheers. Okulov99 (talk) 19:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Okulov99. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Coherent addition, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)