Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:58, Sunday, November 24, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Hi Oksanna, this is Kevin I'm just writing on you talk page. Hope your having a good day and I'll see you in class tomorrow.Odinlosemei (talk) 18:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that I'll make the comment on the probable cause wiki entry in the talk part about the sections that don't have any citations. Were you still planning on commenting on the accident investigation and how it doesn't tie in very well with the rest of the article?Odinlosemei (talk) 00:40, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey here's the citations for the bibliography.

Bowers, Josh. "Probable Cause, Constitutional Reasonableness and The Unrecognized Point of a "Pointless Indignity"" Standford Law Review 66.5 (2014): 987-1050. ABI/INFORM. Web. 2 Oct. 2014. <http://search.proquest.com/docview/1535656256>.

Taslitz, Andrew E. "Cybersurveillance Without Restraint? The Meaning and Social Value of The Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion Standards in Governmental Access to Third-Party Electronic Records." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 103.3 (2013): 839-905. Ebsco Host. Web. 2 Oct. 2014. <http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=332266e1-133f-44b2-9ba1-c6847cb67247%40sessionmgr4002&hid=4101&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=89862801>.

Lerner, Craig S. "The Reasonableness of Probable Cause." Texas Law Review 81.4 (2003): 951. Ebsco Host. Web. 2 Oct. 2014. <http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=12&sid=332266e1-133f-44b2-9ba1-c6847cb67247%40sessionmgr4002&hid=4101&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=9240320>.Odinlosemei (talk) 03:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the outline we drew up in class, I don't know if you want to change any of it or add more just do it and I'll post it tomorrow before class on the talk page of Probable Cause if that's alright with you.

Outline

Probable Cause

Broader Definition (Applicable to various country’s or a definition from a World Council)
Picture of someone searching a car or house, a constitution.

Table of Contents

Definitions by countries

United States
- History and Development
  - English Law, Constitution, Terry v. Ohio (Others?)
Sweden
Other Countries (do we want to add more?)

Applications of Probable Cause Searches/ Special Circumstances/Exceptions

Probationers and Parolees
Incident Investigations (Add Info and Ref)
Other Countries – US Application (maybe include this in Definition by countries?)
Cybersurveillance
- Patriot Act?
K9 Units

Related Cases

References

Bibliography

External Links Odinlosemei (talk) 01:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I've write for the Peer Review. I haven't posted it yet but I'll probably do that tomorrow morning.

3. Looking at the outline for planned revisions I liked how there were specific citations included in the list of things to be adjusted in the article, such as increased intelligence-led policing beyond 1990's and 9/11 with the citation of carter and carter. An area that could be worked on is the vagueness of what is going to be done regarding certain things such as the "Possible of Expansion of Canada section". Maybe you could write some specific things that you would want to add or change. The "Expansion of issues and potential of current listed issues having been resolved or near resolved" part of the outline is kind of confusing and I'm not sure what is trying to be said or done to the article. A little clarification about this might be good 4. In the next few weeks, things to focus on might be adding information to the article that are cited in the outline such as the possible expansion of sections. Odinlosemei (talk) 02:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 16:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]